Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23250790›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2013

Selective laser sintering in biomedical engineering.

Alida Mazzoli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 3D printed microfluidic devices with electrodes for electrochemical analysis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2024
    Review
  14. Improved Biocompatibility in Laser-Polished Implants.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review: Application of 3D Printing Technology in Soft Robots.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alida MazzoliDepartment of Scienze e Ingegneria della Materia, dell'Ambiente ed Urbanistica SIMAU, Faculty of Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy. a.mazzoli@univpm.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a solid freeform fabrication technique, developed by Carl Deckard for his master's thesis at the University of Texas, patented in 1989. SLS manufacturing is a technique that produces physical models through a selective solidification of a variety of fine powders. SLS technology is getting a great amount of attention in the clinical field. In this paper the characteristics features of SLS and the materials that have been developed for are reviewed together with a discussion on the principles of the above-mentioned manufacturing technique. The applications of SLS in tissue engineering, and at-large in the biomedical field, are reviewed and discussed.

Indexed as

Biomedical EngineeringLasersTissue EngineeringBone SubstitutesHumansTissue ScaffoldsBone Substitutes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.