Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23250350›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2013

Efficacy and complications of open and minimally invasive surgery in acute Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomised clinical study--preliminary report.

Lukas Kołodziej, Andrzej Bohatyrewicz, Justyna Kromuszczyńska, Jarosław Jezierski, Maciej Biedroń

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2014
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Outcomes of Limited Open Achilles Repair Using Modified Ring Forceps.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2018
    Article
  17. Minimally invasive surgery and percutaneous surgery of the hindfoot and midfoot.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukas KołodziejDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Musculoskeletal Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland. lukas@hot.pl
Andrzej Bohatyrewicz
Justyna Kromuszczyńska
Jarosław Jezierski
Maciej Biedroń
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical treatment of an acute Achilles tendon rupture can effectively reduce the risk of re-rupture, but it increases the probability of surgical complications. We postulated that a minimally invasive surgical treatment might reduce the number of complications related to open surgery and improve the functional results.

methodWe enrolled 47 patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures in a prospective, randomised trial to compare clinical results and complications between a minimally invasive procedure with the Achillon(®) device and traditional open surgery with Krackow-type sutures. The average patient age was 46 years. The follow up time was 24 months.

resultsNo Achilles tendon re-rupture or nerve injury occurred in treated patients. There were two cases of wound infections in the open surgery group, and one superficial wound infection occurred in the minimally invasive group. The groups were not significantly different in the amount of pain, range of ankle movements, the single heel-rise test, calf circumference, or time to return to work and sports.

conclusionAfter a two year follow-up period, we found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups treated with traditional open surgery or minimally invasive surgery.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOrthopedic ProceduresProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRisk FactorsRuptureSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID23250350
PMCPMC3609980
OpenAlexW2102971218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.