Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23250146›Full record

ReviewNutrients2012

Space flight calcium: implications for astronaut health, spacecraft operations, and Earth.

Scott M Smith, Torin McCoy, Daniel Gazda, Jennifer L L Morgan, Martina Heer, Sara R Zwart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The regulation of RANKL by mechanical force.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2021
    Review
  17. Implications of Altered Endosome and Lysosome Biology in Space Environments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Osteoclasts and Microgravity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Scott M SmithHuman Health and Performance Directorate, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, USA. scott.m.smith@nasa.gov
Torin McCoy
Daniel Gazda
Jennifer L L Morgan
Martina Heer
Sara R Zwart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The space flight environment is known to induce bone loss and, subsequently, calcium loss. The longer the mission, generally the more bone and calcium are lost. This review provides a history of bone and calcium studies related to space flight and highlights issues related to calcium excretion that the space program must consider so that urine can be recycled. It also discusses a novel technique using natural stable isotopes of calcium that will be helpful in the future to determine calcium and bone balance during space flight.

Indexed as

AstronautsBone DensitySpace FlightAnimalsBone and BonesCalciumDecalcification, PathologicEarth, PlanetHumansSpacecraftWeightlessnessCalcium

Identifiers

PMID23250146
PMCPMC3546622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.