Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23249810›Full record

Trial reportmBio2012

Twice-daily application of HIV microbicides alter the vaginal microbiota.

Jacques Ravel, Pawel Gajer, Li Fu, Christine K Mauck, Sara S K Koenig, Joyce Sakamoto, Alison A Motsinger-Reif, Gustavo F Doncel, Steven L Zeichner

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in mBio, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Drug transporters in tissues and cells relevant to sexual transmission of HIV: Implications for drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jacques RavelInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. jravel@som.umaryland.edu
Pawel Gajer
Li Fu
Christine K Mauck
Sara S K Koenig
Joyce Sakamoto
Alison A Motsinger-Reif
Gustavo F Doncel
Steven L Zeichner
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USChildren's National · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

The District of Columbia Developmental Center for AIDS Research (DC D-CFAR)P30AI087714 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, ALAN EDWARD · 2010 to 2014
$8.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI1079798NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI087714NIAID NIH HHS P30AI087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledVaginal HIV microbicides offer great promise in preventing HIV transmission, but failures of phase 3 clinical trials, in which microbicide-treated subjects had an increased risk of HIV transmission, raised concerns about endpoints used to evaluate microbicide safety. A possible explanation for the increased transmission risk is that the agents shifted the vaginal bacterial community, resulting in loss of natural protection and enhanced HIV transmission susceptibility. We characterized vaginal microbiota, using pyrosequencing of bar-coded 16S rRNA gene fragments, in samples from 35 healthy, sexually abstinent female volunteer subjects (ages 18 to 50 years) with regular menses in a repeat phase 1 study of twice-daily application over 13.5 days of 1 of 3 gel products: a hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC)-based "universal" placebo (10 subjects), 6% cellulose sulfate (CS; 13 subjects), and 4% nonoxynol-9 (N-9; 12 subjects). We used mixed effects models inferred using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, which showed that treatment with active agents shifted the microbiota toward a community type lacking significant numbers of Lactobacillus spp. and dominated by strict anaerobes. This state of the vaginal microbiota was associated with a low or intermediate Nugent score and was not identical to bacterial vaginosis, an HIV transmission risk factor. The placebo arm contained a higher proportion of communities dominated by Lactobacillus spp., particularly L. crispatus, throughout treatment. The data suggest that molecular evaluation of microbicide effects on vaginal microbiota may be a critical endpoint that should be incorporated in early clinical assessment of microbicide candidates. IMPORTANCE: Despite large prevention efforts, HIV transmission and acquisition rates remain unacceptably high. In developing countries, transmission mainly occurs through heterosexual intercourse, where women are significantly more vulnerable to infection than men. Vaginal microbicides are considered to be one of the most promising female-controlled products, in that women themselves insert the microbicides into the vagina to prevent HIV transmission during sexual intercourse. The failure of several microbicides in clinical trials has raised questions concerning the low in vivo efficacy of such anti-HIV molecules. This study was designed to gain insights into the failures of two microbicides by testing the hypothesis that the microbicides negatively affect a critical line of defense against HIV, the vaginal microbiota. The results suggest that in the early assessment of candidate microbicides, culture-independent evaluation of their effect on the vaginal microbiota should be considered and may constitute a critical endpoint.

Indexed as

BiotaAdministration, IntravaginalAdolescentAdultAnti-Infective AgentsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleHIV InfectionsHuman ExperimentationHumansMetagenomeMiddle AgedPlacebosRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAAnti-Infective AgentsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalPlacebosRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23249810
PMCPMC3529542
OpenAlexW2110881267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.