Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23249673›Full record

ReviewReports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)2013

Single-molecule nanometry for biological physics.

Hajin Kim, Taekjip Ha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improved Glass Surface Passivation for Single-Molecule Nanoarrays.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The bright future of single-molecule fluorescence imaging.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hajin KimHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Taekjip Ha

Funding

Single Molecule Study of Helicase MechanismsR01GM065367 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HA, TAEKJIP · 2002 to 2014
$3.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM065367NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision measurement is a hallmark of physics but the small length scale (∼nanometer) of elementary biological components and thermal fluctuations surrounding them challenge our ability to visualize their action. Here, we highlight the recent developments in single-molecule nanometry where the position of a single fluorescent molecule can be determined with nanometer precision, reaching the limit imposed by the shot noise, and the relative motion between two molecules can be determined with ∼0.3 nm precision at ∼1 ms time resolution, as well as how these new tools are providing fundamental insights into how motor proteins move on cellular highways. We will also discuss how interactions between three and four fluorescent molecules can be used to measure three and six coordinates, respectively, allowing us to correlate the movements of multiple components. Finally, we will discuss recent progress in combining angstrom-precision optical tweezers with single-molecule fluorescent detection, opening new windows for multi-dimensional single-molecule nanometry for biological physics.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersMaterials TestingMolecular ImagingNanoparticlesNanotechnologySpectrometry, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID23249673
PMCPMC3549428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.