Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23249563›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics2013

ATRX: the case of a peculiar chromatin remodeler.

Kajan Ratnakumar, Emily Bernstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mutant ATRX: pathogenesis of ATRX syndrome and cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Probing the Protein-Protein Interaction Between the ATRXMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The tale of a tail: histone H4 acetylation and the repair of DNA breaks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kajan RatnakumarDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Emily Bernstein
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York Proton Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler ATRX has recently garnered renewed attention. ATRX mutations were first identified in patients bearing the syndrome after which it is named, alpha thalassemia/mental retardation, X-linked. While ATRX has long been implicated in transcriptional regulation through multiple mechanisms, recent studies have identified a role for ATRX in the regulation of histone variant deposition. In addition, current reports describe ATRX to be mutated at high percentages in multiple tumor types, suggestive of a potential 'driver' role in cancer. Here we discuss the numerous and seemingly diverse roles for ATRX in transcriptional regulation and histone deposition and suggest that ATRX's effects are mediated by its regulation of histones within the chromatin template.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and Disassemblyalpha-ThalassemiaAnimalsG-QuadruplexesHistonesHumansNuclear ProteinsTranscription, GeneticX-Linked Intellectual DisabilityHistonesNuclear ProteinsATRXhistone variantsmacroH2A and H3.3telomeresα-globin

Identifiers

PMID23249563
PMCPMC3549878
OpenAlexW2090220750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.