Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23248786›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie2012

Trends in time to diagnosis of colon cancer and impact on clinical outcomes.

Harminder Singh, Emma Shu, Alain Demers, Charles N Bernstein, Jane Griffith, Katherine Fradette

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Delays in referral from primary care worsen survival for patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harminder SinghDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Emma Shu
Alain Demers
Charles N Bernstein
Jane Griffith
Katherine Fradette
CancerCare Manitoba · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been a rapid increase in screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) over the past several years in North America. This could paradoxically lead to worsening outcomes if the system is not adapted to deal with the increased demand. For example, this could create increased wait times for endoscopy and delayed time to CRC diagnosis, which could worsen clinical outcomes such as stage at diagnosis and⁄or survival. No previous Canadian study has evaluated the association between time to CRC diagnosis and clinical outcomes.

methodsThe present historical cohort study used Manitoba's population-based cancer registry and Manitoba Health administrative databases. The effect of time to diagnosis on patient survival was evaluated using Cox regression analysis with adjustment for stage at diagnosis, grade of CRC, age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidity index score and year of CRC diagnosis. The association between time to diagnosis and CRC stage at diagnosis was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe median time to CRC diagnosis increased significantly from 72 days (95% CI 61 days to 83 days) in 2004 to 105 days (95% CI 64 days to 129 days) in the first three months of 2009 (P=0.04). There was no significant association between time to diagnosis and survival. Individuals with the longest time to diagnosis were less likely to have stage III⁄IV CRC at diagnosis (quartile 4 versus quartile 1: OR 0.50 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.75).

conclusionTime to CRC diagnosis is continuing to increase in Manitoba. Although the present study did not detect a significant negative clinical effect of increasing time to diagnosis, additional studies are required.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleManitobaMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23248786
PMCPMC3551560
OpenAlexW158353643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.