ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2012
Next generation sequencing in clinical medicine: Challenges and lessons for pathology and biomedical informatics.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Integration of bulk RNA-seq pipeline metrics for assessing low-quality samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Squidiff: predicting cellular development and responses to perturbations using a diffusion model.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Squidiff: Predicting cellular development and responses to perturbations using a diffusion model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ocular Characteristics and Genotype-Oriented Disease Spectrum of Alström Syndrome in Taiwan.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Emerging therapeutic strategies in glioblastsoma: drug repurposing, mechanisms of resistance, precision medicine, and technological innovations.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Application of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Techniques for Selected Companion Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS): Platforms and Applications.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Malaria Vector Control: The Importance of Accurate Species Identification through Enhanced Molecular Capacity.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Determinants of targeted cancer therapy use in community oncology practice: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Rummler-Brache process mapping.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of Mosaic Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Subtle or Unusual Cutaneous Findings.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023Article
- FFPE-Based NGS Approaches into Clinical Practice: The Limits of Glory from a Pathologist Viewpoint.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Single-Cell Multiomics Analysis for Drug Discovery.Metabolites · 2021Review
- MSIsensor-ct: microsatellite instability detection using cfDNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- GenoVault: a cloud based genomics repository.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Pathologists at the Leading Edge of Optimizing the Tumor Tissue Journey for Diagnostic Accuracy and Molecular Testing.American journal of clinical pathology · 2021Review
- Review
- Genetic characteristics and epidemiology of inherited retinal degeneration in Taiwan.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Immune-associated biomarkers for early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease based on hematological lncRNA-mRNA co-expression.Bioscience reports · 2020Article
- Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Human Genome Project (HGP) provided the initial draft of mankind's DNA sequence in 2001. The HGP was produced by 23 collaborating laboratories using Sanger sequencing of mapped regions as well as shotgun sequencing techniques in a process that occupied 13 years at a cost of ~$3 billion. Today, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques represent the next phase in the evolution of DNA sequencing technology at dramatically reduced cost compared to traditional Sanger sequencing. A single laboratory today can sequence the entire human genome in a few days for a few thousand dollars in reagents and staff time. Routine whole exome or even whole genome sequencing of clinical patients is well within the realm of affordability for many academic institutions across the country. This paper reviews current sequencing technology methods and upcoming advancements in sequencing technology as well as challenges associated with data generation, data manipulation and data storage. Implementation of routine NGS data in cancer genomics is discussed along with potential pitfalls in the interpretation of the NGS data. The overarching importance of bioinformatics in the clinical implementation of NGS is emphasized.[7] We also review the issue of physician education which also is an important consideration for the successful implementation of NGS in the clinical workplace. NGS technologies represent a golden opportunity for the next generation of pathologists to be at the leading edge of the personalized medicine approaches coming our way. Often under-emphasized issues of data access and control as well as potential ethical implications of whole genome NGS sequencing are also discussed. Despite some challenges, it's hard not to be optimistic about the future of personalized genome sequencing and its potential impact on patient care and the advancement of knowledge of human biology and disease in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.