Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23248711›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2012

Health service use among patients with chronic or multiple illnesses, and frequent attenders: secondary analysis of routine primary care data from 1996 to 2006.

Johannes Hauswaldt, Eva Hummers-Pradier, Ulrike Junius-Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Implementation of pharmacotherapy monitoring: Experiences and views of medicine users.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Methodological flaw in the study design.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2013
    Article
  14. In reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes HauswaldtDepartment of General Practice at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, Göttingen, Germany. Johannes.Hauswaldt@med.uni-goettingen.de
Eva Hummers-Pradier
Ulrike Junius-Walker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle or no longitudinal data have been available to date on the utilization of primary care physicians' services, particularly by chronically ill and multimorbid patients and by those who see their primary care physician often ("frequent attenders").

methodsWe collected anonymous data on 305 896 patients from 155 primary care practices over the period 1996-2006 and analyzed them with descriptive statistics, correlations, and multiple logistic regression.

resultsOver the period of the study, patients visited their primary care physicians about 7 times per year on average. Frequent attendance, defined as 24 or more contacts per year, was not strongly associated with chronic illness or multimorbidity (r=0.19 and r=0.24, respectively) but was found to be linked to time-consuming medical services, such as detailed counseling (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.8) and house calls (OR, 3.5). Chronically ill patients utilized their primary care physicians' services less than we had expected. Chronic illness and multimorbidity were more common with increasing age; also correlated with age were the utilization of medical services, the number of visits to the primary care physician, and the number of visits to the primary care physician among frequent attenders. DISCUSSION: Although in Germany visits to physicians of all types (both primary care physicians and specialists) in private practice became more frequent in total over the period of this study, visits to primary care physicians alone did not. Frequent attenders do not necessarily have chronic illness or multimorbidity but seem to constitute a particularly problematic group. Chronic illness is not a predictor for greater utilization of primary care physicians' services.

Indexed as

Utilization ReviewAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChronic DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23248711
PMCPMC3521193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.