Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23248676›Full record

ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2012

The potential effect of the extract of Crocus sativus and safranal on the total and differential white blood cells of ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs.

G Bayrami, M H Boskabady

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Saffron (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Possible therapeutic effects ofPharmaceutical biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G BayramiDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Research Centre, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, I.R. Iran .
M H Boskabady
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated relaxant, inhibitory effect on histamine (H1) and muscarinic receptors, and stimulatory effect on β-drenoceptor of Crocus sativus on guinea pig tracheal chains. In the present study, the effect of the extract of C. sativus and one of its constituents, safranal, on the inflammatory changes of sensitized guinea pigs was examined. Eight groups of sensitized guinea pigs to ovalbumin were studied. One group was given drinking water alone (group S), while other 7 groups were received drinking water containing; three concentrations of safranal (4, 8 and 16 μg/ml), three concentrations of extract (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg/ml) and one concentration of dexamethasone (S+D group), (six animal in each group). Total and differential white blood cell (WBC) counts in blood were evaluated. Total blood WBC number, eosinophyl and lymphocyte percentage in blood were increased, but neutrophil decreased in sensitized animals compared to those of control groups (P<0.05 to P<0.001). Treatment of animals with dexamethasone, all concentrations of the extract and safranal significantly improved most types of WBCs but total WBC number was only decreased in treated groups with dexamethasone and high concentration of the extract compared to group S (P<0.05 to P<0.001). Safranal was more effective in the improvement of eosinophil and lymphocyte compared to the extracts (P<0.001 for both cases). However, the preventive effect of the extract of C. sativus on total WBC count was more prominent than that of the safranal (P<0.01). These results showed a preventive effect of the extract of C. sativus and its constituent safranal on total and differential count of WBC in blood of sensitized guinea pigs. The results also suggest that the effect of the plant is perhaps due to its constituent of safranal.

Indexed as

AsthmaCrocus sativusInflammationSafranalSensitizationWBC

Identifiers

PMID23248676
PMCPMC3523417
OpenAlexW1507062910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.