ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock2012
Hemorrhagic shock: The "physiology approach".
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of large animal models of combined traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Vasopressin in hemorrhagic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized animal trials.BioMed research international · 2014Pooled it
- Myocardial Infarction-Associated Shock: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phenotypes, SCAI Classification, and Outcome Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The effect of subdiaphragmatic vagotomy on heart rate variability and lung inflammation in rats with severe hemorrhagic shock.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary Programed Learning Simulation to Improve Visual Blood Loss Estimation for Obstetric Trauma Scenarios.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022Article
- Comparison of the trometamol-balanced solution with two other crystalloid solutions for fluid resuscitation of a rat hemorrhagic model.Journal of veterinary science · 2020Article
- Digital postpartum hemorrhage management device (DPHMD).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Thromboelastometry-guided hemostatic therapy for hemorrhagic shock in the postoperative period of vascular surgery: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2018Article
- Vital Sign Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women with Hypovolemic Shock: The Role of Shock Index.PloS one · 2016Article
- Time to Change ATLS Classifications of Hemorrhagic Shock.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
- The Need for a Physiological Classification of Hemorrhagic Shock.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A shift of approach from 'clinics trying to fit physiology' to the one of 'physiology to clinics', with interpretation of the clinical phenomena from their physiological bases to the tip of the clinical iceberg, and a management exclusively based on modulation of physiology, is finally surging as the safest and most efficacious philosophy in hemorrhagic shock. ATLS(®) classification and recommendations on hemorrhagic shock are not helpful because antiphysiological and potentially misleading. Hemorrhagic shock needs to be reclassified in the direction of usefulness and timing of intervention: in particular its assessment and management need to be tailored to physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.