ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2012
Endoscopic placement of fully covered self expanding metal stents for management of post-operative foregut leaks.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stent Management of Leaks After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Endoscopic Stents in the Management of Bariatric Complications: Our Algorithm and Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
- Endoscopic Internal Drainage Coupled to Prompt External Drainage Mobilization Is an Effective Approach for the Treatment of Complicated Cases of Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2019Article
- Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Efficacy of endoscopic management of leak after foregut surgery with endoscopic covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS).Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Gastroesophageal stenting for the management of post sleeve gastrectomy leak. A single institution experience.Saudi medical journal · 2016Article
- Temporary duodenal stenting as a bridge to ERCP for inaccessible papilla due to duodenal obstruction: a retrospective study.Endoscopy international open · 2016Article
- A Specifically Designed Stent for Anastomotic Leaks after Bariatric Surgery: Experiences in a Tertiary Referral Hospital.Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- An Endoscopic Strategy Combining Mega Stents and Over-The-Scope Clips for the Management of Post-Bariatric Surgery Leaks and Fistulas (with video).Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- Fully covered self-expandable metal stent in the treatment of postsurgical colorectal diseases: outcome in 29 patients.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Laparo-Endoscopic Gastrostomy (LEG) Decompression: a Novel One-Time Method of Management of Gastric Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2015Article
- Treatment of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy by Endoscopic Internal Drainage (EID).Obesity surgery · 2015Article
- Clinical outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal diseases: A pooled analysis of the literature.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Article
- Endoscopic Internal Drainage with Enteral Nutrition (EDEN) for treatment of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFully covered self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement has been successfully described for the treatment of malignant and benign conditions. The aim of this study is to evaluate our experience of fully covered SEMS placement for post-operative foregut leaks. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective analysis was done for indications, outcomes and complications of SEMS placed in homogeneous population of 15 patients with post-operative foregut leaks in our tertiary-care centre from December 2008 to December 2010. Stent placement and removal, clinical and radiological evidence of leak healing, migration and other complications were the main outcomes analyzed.
resultsTwenty-three HANAROSTENT(®) SEMS were successfully placed in 14/15 patients (93%) with post-operative foregut leaks for an average duration of 28.73 days (range=1-42 days) per patient and 18.73 days per SEMS. Three (20%) patients needed to be re-stented for persistent leaks ultimately resulting in leak closure. Total 5/15 (33.33%) patients and 7/23 (30.43%) stents showed migration; 5/7 (71.42%) migrated stents could be retrieved endoscopically. There were mucosal ulceration in 2/15 (13.33%) and pain in 1/15 (6.66%) patients.
conclusionsStenting with SEMS seems to be a feasible option as a primary care modality for patients with post-operative foregut leaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.