Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23248297›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Spatiotemporal analysis of organelle and macromolecular complex inheritance.

Victoria Menendez-Benito, Sjoerd J van Deventer, Victor Jimenez-Garcia, Marina Roy-Luzarraga, Fred van Leeuwen, Jacques Neefjes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification of long-lived proteins retained in cells undergoing repeated asymmetric divisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolving models for peroxisome biogenesis.Current opinion in cell biology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria Menendez-BenitoDivision of Cell Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Netherlands Proteomics Centre, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. v.menendez@nki.nl
Sjoerd J van Deventer
Victor Jimenez-Garcia
Marina Roy-Luzarraga
Fred van Leeuwen
Jacques Neefjes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following mitosis, daughter cells must inherit a functional set of essential proteins and organelles. We applied a genetic tool to simultaneously monitor the kinetics and distribution of old and new proteins marking all intracellular compartments in budding yeasts. Most organelles followed a general pattern whereby preexisting proteins are symmetrically partitioned followed by template-based incorporation of new proteins. Peroxisomes belong to this group, supporting a model of biogenesis by growth and division from preexisting peroxisomes. We detected two exceptions: the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and the spindle pole body (SPB). Old NPCs are stably inherited during successive generations but remained separated from new NPCs, which are incorporated de novo in mother and daughter cells. Only the SPB displayed asymmetrical distribution, with old components primarily inherited by daughter cells and new proteins equally incorporated in both cells. Our analysis resolves conflicting models (peroxisomes, NPC) and reveals unique patterns (NPC, SPB) of organelle inheritance.

Indexed as

Cell CompartmentationMicroscopy, FluorescenceMitosisModels, BiologicalNuclear PoreOrganellesPeroxisomesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpindle ApparatusTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID23248297
PMCPMC3538235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.