Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23247887›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2013

Surgical treatment for nonspecific esophageal motility disorders.

Takanori Inose, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Shigemasa Suzuki, Naritaka Tanaka, Makoto Sakai, Akihiko Sano, Takehiko Yokobori, Makoto Sohda, Masanobu Nakajima, Minoru Fukuchi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takanori InoseDepartment of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan. inose@med.gunma-u.ac.jp
Tatsuya Miyazaki
Shigemasa Suzuki
Naritaka Tanaka
Makoto Sakai
Akihiko Sano
Takehiko Yokobori
Makoto Sohda
Masanobu Nakajima
Minoru Fukuchi
Hiroyuki Kato
Hiroyuki Kuwano
Gunma University · JPDokkyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNonspecific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD) is a vague category that includes patients with poorly defined contraction abnormalities observed during esophageal manometry. This study investigated the therapeutic effects of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach using long myotomy and fundopexy for NEMD.

methodsThe VATS approach using myotomy and fundopexy was performed for 4 patients of NEMD between 2005 and 2008. A total of 4 patients with NEMD that underwent treatment at our institution were analyzed retrospectively.

resultsThe patients included 2 males and 2 females with a median age of 48 years (range 21-74 years). The median duration of NEMD symptoms was 58 months (range 4-108 months). Dysphagia was a primary symptom in all patients. Chest pain was a primary symptom in 3 of 4 patients (75 %). Treatment with medication was attempted before the operation. The median operative time was 344.5 min (range 210-476 min). The median time before starting oral feeding was 2.5 days (range 2-22 days). All patients achieved a significant improvement of their previous condition.

conclusionsThe VATS approach using myotomy and fundopexy for NEMD is a good treatment in cases resistant to medication and balloon dilation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChest PainDeglutition DisordersEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23247887
OpenAlexW2045823491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.