Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23247736›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013

Needs analysis for developing a virtual-reality NOTES simulator.

Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Kai Matthes, Arun Nemani, Woojin Ahn, Masayuki Kato, Daniel B Jones, Steven Schwaitzberg, Suvranu De

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Validation of NOViSE.Surgical innovation · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. NOViSE: a virtual natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery simulator.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proficiency in Laparoscopic Training: online versus Onsite Suturing Courses.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Observational
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ganesh SankaranarayananCenter for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
Kai Matthes
Arun Nemani
Woojin Ahn
Masayuki Kato
Daniel B Jones
Steven Schwaitzberg
Suvranu De
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USHarvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Physically Realistic Virtual SurgeryR01EB005807 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DE, SUVRANU, JACKSON, CULLEN DAVIS · 2006 to 2024
$7.0M
Developing Physics-Based Virtual Simulation Technology for Natural Orifice TranslR01EB009362 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CAO, CAROLINE GL, DE, SUVRANU · 2011 to 2014
$2.6M
Development and Validation of a Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer (VEST)R01EB014305 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CAO, CAROLINE GL, DE, SUVRANU · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
Developing a Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST)R01EB010037 · NIBIB · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI CAO, CAROLINE GL, DE, SUVRANU · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005807NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009362NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB009362NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010037NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledINTRODUCTION AND STUDY

aimNatural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an emerging surgical technique that requires a cautious adoption approach to ensure patient safety. High-fidelity virtual-reality-based simulators allow development of new surgical procedures and tools and train medical personnel without risk to human patients. As part of a project funded by the National Institutes of Health, we are developing the virtual transluminal endoscopic surgery trainer (VTEST) for this purpose. The objective of this study is to conduct a structured needs analysis to identify the design parameters for such a virtual-reality-based simulator for NOTES.

methodsA 30-point questionnaire was distributed at the 2011 National Orifice Surgery Consortium for Assessment and Research meeting to obtain responses from experts. Ordinal logistic regression and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for analysis.

resultsA total of 22 NOTES experts participated in the study. Cholecystectomy (CE, 68 %) followed by appendectomy (AE, 63 %) (CE vs AE, p = 0.0521) was selected as the first choice for simulation. Flexible (FL, 47 %) and hybrid (HY, 47 %) approaches were equally favorable compared with rigid (RI, 6 %) with p < 0.001 for both FL versus RI and HY versus RI. The transvaginal approach was preferred 3 to 1 to the transgastric. Most participants preferred two-channel (2C) scopes (65 %) compared with single (1C) or three (3C) or more channels with p < 0.001 for both 2C versus 1C and 2C versus 3C. The importance of force feedback and the utility of a virtual NOTES simulator in training and testing new tools for NOTES were rated very high by the participants.

conclusionOur study reinforces the importance of developing a virtual NOTES simulator and clearly presents expert preferences. The results of this analysis will direct our initial development of the VTEST platform.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationConsumer BehaviorHealth Services Needs and DemandModels, AnatomicUser-Computer InterfaceAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesAppendectomyCadaverCholecystectomyDogsEndoscopesEquipment DesignFeedback, SensoryHemostasis, SurgicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID23247736
PMCPMC3618859
OpenAlexW2077734937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.