Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23247578›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2013

Intestinal metaplasia recurs infrequently in patients successfully treated for Barrett's esophagus with radiofrequency ablation.

Eric S Orman, Hannah P Kim, William J Bulsiewicz, Cary C Cotton, Evan S Dellon, Melissa B Spacek, Xiaoxin Chen, Ryan D Madanick, Sarina Pasricha, Nicholas J Shaheen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Efficacy and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's Esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Chemoprevention in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Durability of Endoscopic Treatment for Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Natural History of the Post-ablation Esophagus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Quality Indicators in Endoscopic Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Endoscopic Treatment of High-Grade Dysplasia and Intramucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric S Orman *Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Hannah P Kim *Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
William J BulsiewiczCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Cary C CottonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Melissa B SpacekCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Xiaoxin ChenCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Ryan D MadanickCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Sarina PasrichaDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Nicholas J ShaheenCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing (CEDAS), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: BPCAUL1RR025747 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$44.6M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LINNAN, LAURA A · 2010 to 2020
$9.7M
DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)KL2TR001109 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001109NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025747NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR025747NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK07634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is safe and effective in eradicating dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia, and may reduce rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We assessed rates of and risk factors for disease recurrence after successful treatment of BE with RFA.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who completed RFA for dysplastic BE or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), achieved complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) or intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), and underwent subsequent endoscopic surveillance at a single center. Rates of disease recurrence and progression were determined. Patients with and without recurrent disease were compared to determine risk factors for recurrence.

resultsTwo hundred and sixty-two subjects underwent RFA during the study period. Of these, 119 and 112 patients were retained in endoscopic surveillance after CE-D and CE-IM, respectively. Median observation time was 397 days (range: 54-1,668 days). Eight patients (7% of those with CE-IM) had recurrent disease after a median of 235 days (range 55-1,124 days). Progression to IMC (n=1) or EAC (n=2) occurred in three of these eight patients, all of whom had pre-ablation high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Five patients had recurrence of non-dysplastic BE (n=3), low-grade dysplasia (n=1), and HGD (n=1). During 155 patient-years of observation, recurrence occurred in 5.2%/year, and progression occurred in 1.9%/year. No clinical characteristics were associated with disease recurrence.

conclusionsIn patients with BE and dysplasia or early cancer who achieved CE-IM, BE recurred in ≈ 5%/year. Patient characteristics did not predict recurrence. Subjects undergoing RFA for dysplastic BE should be retained in endoscopic surveillance.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusCarcinomaDisease ProgressionEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntestinesKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMetaplasiaMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23247578
PMCPMC3809022
OpenAlexW2069821322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.