ReviewDer Anaesthesist2012
[Video laryngoscopy olé! Time to say good bye to direct and flexible intubation?].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pyriform sinus localization-assisted blind intubation: comparison with laryngoscopic intubation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Trial
- Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Severely Restricted Mouth Opening-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Advances in anesthesia technology are improving patient care, but many challenges remain.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Article
- Prediction in airway management: what is worthwhile, what is a waste of time and what about the future?British journal of anaesthesia · 2016Article
- [Peripartum cardiomyopathy: interdisciplinary challenge].Der Anaesthesist · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of video laryngoscopy systems have been introduced into anesthetic practice in recent years. Due to the technical concepts of these systems exposure of the laryngeal structures is usually better than with direct laryngoscopy, both in normal airways as well as in those that are difficult to manage. With the increasing use of video laryngoscopy it seems as if direct laryngoscopy and flexible fibrescopic intubation are at risk of becoming redundant. This article describes current developments and discusses why expertise in direct laryngoscopy and flexible fibrescopic intubation should be maintained, particularly by experts in airway management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23247534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.