Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23247120›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2013

Parasympathetic stimulation via the vagus nerve prevents systemic organ dysfunction by abrogating gut injury and lymph toxicity in trauma and hemorrhagic shock.

Gal Levy, Jordan E Fishman, Dazhong Xu, Benjamin T J Chandler, Eleonora Feketova, Wei Dong, Yong Qin, Vamsi Alli, Luis Ulloa, Edwin A Deitch

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Trauma-toxicology: concepts, causes, complications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Vagus Nerve Stimulation and the Cardiovascular System.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Innate immune responses to trauma.Nature immunology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gal LevyDepartment of General Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Jordan E Fishman
Dazhong Xu
Benjamin T J Chandler
Eleonora Feketova
Wei Dong
Yong Qin
Vamsi Alli
Luis Ulloa
Edwin A Deitch
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USRutgers New Jersey Medical School

Funding

Shock, Trauma and Gut Origin SepsisR01GM059841 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEITCH, EDWIN A · 1999 to 2012
$5.6M
Training in Trauma and Surgical Critical Care ResearchT32GM069330 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIVINGSTON, DAVID H · 2004 to 2015
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059841NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM069330NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM069330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested if vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) would prevent gut injury, mesenteric lymph toxicity, and systemic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome following trauma-hemorrhagic shock (T/HS). Four groups of experiments were performed. The first tested whether VNS (5 V for 10 min) would protect against T/HS-induced increases in gut and lung permeability as well as neutrophil priming. In the second experiment, mesenteric lymph was collected from rats subjected to T/HS or trauma-sham shock with or without VNS and then injected into naive mice to assess its biologic activity. Lung permeability, neutrophil priming, and red blood cell deformability were measured. Next, the role of the spleen in VNS-mediated protection was tested by measuring gut and lung injury in splenectomized rats subjected to sham or actual VNS. Lastly, the ability of nicotine to replicate the gut-protective effect of VNS was tested. Vagus nerve stimulation protected against T/HS-induced gut injury, lung injury, and neutrophil priming (P < 0.05). Not only did VNS limit organ injury after T/HS, but in contrast to the mesenteric lymph collected from the sham-VNS T/HS rats, the mesenteric lymph from the VNS T/HS rats did not cause lung injury, neutrophil priming, or loss of red blood cell deformability (P < 0.05) when injected into naive mice. Removal of the spleen did not prevent the protective effects of VNS on gut or lung injury after T/HS. Similar to VNS, the administration of nicotine also protected the gut from injury after T/HS. Vagus nerve stimulation prevents T/HS-induced gut injury, lung injury, neutrophil priming, and the production of biologically active mesenteric lymph. This protective effect of VNS was not dependent on the spleen but appeared to involve a cholinergic nicotinic receptor, because its beneficial effects could be replicated with nicotine.

Indexed as

AnimalsIntestinal AbsorptionIntestinesLung InjuryLymphMaleMesenteryMiceMultiple Organ FailureNeutrophil ActivationNicotineParasympathetic Nervous SystemPermeabilityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicNicotineReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID23247120
PMCPMC3547655
OpenAlexW2080814925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.