Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23247105›Full record

ReviewMolecular bioSystems2013

Analysis of omics data with genome-scale models of metabolism.

Daniel R Hyduke, Nathan E Lewis, Bernhard Ø Palsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular bioSystems, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Primer on Modelling Approaches for Omics Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Longitudinal big biological data in the AI era.Molecular systems biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Genome-scale knockout simulation and clustering analysis of drug-resistant breast cancer cells reveal drug sensitization targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Genome-scale models in human metabologenomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A High-Quality Genome-Scale Model forACS synthetic biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel R HydukeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA. hyduke@ucsd.edu
Nathan E Lewis
Bernhard Ø Palsson
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

SYNTHETIC SYSTEMSP50GM085764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HASTY, JEFF M, IDEKER, TREY · 2010 to 2018
$23.3M
SURFACE CHEMISTRY OF MYCOBACTERIAR01AI008401 · NIAID · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI GOREN, MAYER B. · 1989 to 1989
–
SURFACE CHEMISTRY OF MYCOBACTERIAR22AI008401 · NIAID · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI GOREN, MAYER B. · 1985 to 1989
–
NIAID NIH HHS Y01 AI008401NIGMS NIH HHS GM085764NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade a massive amount of research has been dedicated to generating omics data to gain insight into a variety of biological phenomena, including cancer, obesity, biofuel production, and infection. Although most of these omics data are available publicly, there is a growing concern that much of these data sit in databases without being used or fully analyzed. Statistical inference methods have been widely applied to gain insight into which genes may influence the activities of others in a given omics data set, however, they do not provide information on the underlying mechanisms or whether the interactions are direct or distal. Biochemically, genetically, and genomically consistent knowledge bases are increasingly being used to extract deeper biological knowledge and understanding from these data sets than possible by inferential methods. This improvement is largely due to knowledge bases providing a validated biological context for interpreting the data.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenomicsMetabolismAnimalsHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID23247105
PMCPMC3594511
OpenAlexW2113365252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.