ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2013
Measurement of microchannel fluidic resistance with a standard voltage meter.
Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Low-Voltage Microfluidics With On-Chip Electrospray Ionization for Miniaturized Protein Analysis.Small methods · 2026Review
- Handmade Paper as a Paper Analytical Device for Determining the Quality of an Antidiabetic Drug.ACS omega · 2022Article
- In Vitro Flow Chamber Design for the Study of Endothelial Cell (Patho)Physiology.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022Review
- Fabrication and characterisation of a silicon-borosilicate glass microfluidic device for synchrotron-based hard X-ray spectroscopy studies.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Programmable µChopper Device with On-Chip Droplet Mergers for Continuous Assay Calibration.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Advancement of analytical modes in a multichannel, microfluidic droplet-based sample chopper employing phase-locked detection.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2018Article
- Closed-loop feedback control for microfluidic systems through automated capacitive fluid height sensing.Lab on a chip · 2018Article
- 3D-templated, fully automated microfluidic input/output multiplexer for endocrine tissue culture and secretion sampling.Lab on a chip · 2017Article
- Integrated Lateral Flow Device for Flow Control with Blood Separation and Biosensing.Micromachines · 2017Article
- Article
- A Laminar Flow-Based Microfluidic Tesla Pump via Lithography Enabled 3D Printing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- A microfluidic interface for the culture and sampling of adiponectin from primary adipocytes.The Analyst · 2015Article
- Rational selection of substrates to improve color intensity and uniformity on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices.The Analyst · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A simplified method for measuring the fluidic resistance (R(fluidic)) of microfluidic channels is presented, in which the electrical resistance (R(elec)) of a channel filled with a conductivity standard solution can be measured and directly correlated to R(fluidic) using a simple equation. Although a slight correction factor could be applied in this system to improve accuracy, results showed that a standard voltage meter could be used without calibration to determine R(fluidic) to within 12% error. Results accurate to within 2% were obtained when a geometric correction factor was applied using these particular channels. When compared to standard flow rate measurements, such as meniscus tracking in outlet tubing, this approach provided a more straightforward alternative and resulted in lower measurement error. The method was validated using 9 different fluidic resistance values (from ∼40 to 600kPa smm(-3)) and over 30 separately fabricated microfluidic devices. Furthermore, since the method is analogous to resistance measurements with a voltage meter in electrical circuits, dynamic R(fluidic) measurements were possible in more complex microfluidic designs. Microchannel R(elec) was shown to dynamically mimic pressure waveforms applied to a membrane in a variable microfluidic resistor. The variable resistor was then used to dynamically control aqueous-in-oil droplet sizes and spacing, providing a unique and convenient control system for droplet-generating devices. This conductivity-based method for fluidic resistance measurement is thus a useful tool for static or real-time characterization of microfluidic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.