Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23245901›Full record

ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2013

Measurement of microchannel fluidic resistance with a standard voltage meter.

Leah A Godwin, Kennon S Deal, Lauren D Hoepfner, Louis A Jackson, Christopher J Easley

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah A GodwinAuburn University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
Kennon S Deal
Lauren D Hoepfner
Louis A Jackson
Christopher J Easley

Funding

Unmasking mechanisms of lipolytic dynamics in adipose tissue using high-resolution microfluidic samplingR01DK093810 · NIDDK · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI EASLEY, CHRISTOPHER J · 2012 to 2023
$3.8M
Functional Selection of High Performance EnzymesR43HG006078 · NHGRI · LUCIGEN CORPORATION · PI EASLEY, CHRISTOPHER J, MEAD, DAVID ALAN · 2011 to 2011
$199k
NHGRI NIH HHS R43 HG006078NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simplified method for measuring the fluidic resistance (R(fluidic)) of microfluidic channels is presented, in which the electrical resistance (R(elec)) of a channel filled with a conductivity standard solution can be measured and directly correlated to R(fluidic) using a simple equation. Although a slight correction factor could be applied in this system to improve accuracy, results showed that a standard voltage meter could be used without calibration to determine R(fluidic) to within 12% error. Results accurate to within 2% were obtained when a geometric correction factor was applied using these particular channels. When compared to standard flow rate measurements, such as meniscus tracking in outlet tubing, this approach provided a more straightforward alternative and resulted in lower measurement error. The method was validated using 9 different fluidic resistance values (from ∼40 to 600kPa smm(-3)) and over 30 separately fabricated microfluidic devices. Furthermore, since the method is analogous to resistance measurements with a voltage meter in electrical circuits, dynamic R(fluidic) measurements were possible in more complex microfluidic designs. Microchannel R(elec) was shown to dynamically mimic pressure waveforms applied to a membrane in a variable microfluidic resistor. The variable resistor was then used to dynamically control aqueous-in-oil droplet sizes and spacing, providing a unique and convenient control system for droplet-generating devices. This conductivity-based method for fluidic resistance measurement is thus a useful tool for static or real-time characterization of microfluidic systems.

Indexed as

Electrical Equipment and SuppliesCalibrationElectric ImpedanceEquipment DesignMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesSolutionsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID23245901
PMCPMC3549673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.