Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23245760›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2013

Neural and behavioral effects of a novel mu opioid receptor antagonist in binge-eating obese people.

Victoria C Cambridge, Hisham Ziauddeen, Pradeep J Nathan, Naresh Subramaniam, Chris Dodds, Samuel R Chamberlain, Annelize Koch, Kay Maltby, Andrew L Skeggs, Antonella Napolitano and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Total-body imaging of mu-opioid receptors with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Feeding Releases Endogenous Opioids in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria C CambridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, Behavioural & Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hisham Ziauddeen
Pradeep J Nathan
Naresh Subramaniam
Chris Dodds
Samuel R Chamberlain
Annelize Koch
Kay Maltby
Andrew L Skeggs
Antonella Napolitano
I Sadaf Farooqi
Edward T Bullmore
Paul C Fletcher
University of Cambridge · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0001354Wellcome Trust 095692Wellcome Trust 098497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBinge eating is associated with obesity and has been conceptualized as "food addiction." However, this view has received only inconsistent support in humans, and limited evidence relates key neurocircuitry to the disorder. Moreover, relatively few studies have used pharmacologic functional magnetic resonance imaging to probe the underlying basis of altered eating behaviors.

methodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, we explored the effects of a potent mu-opioid receptor antagonist, GSK1521498, in obese individuals with moderate binge eating. Subjects were tested during a baseline placebo run-in period and retested after 28-days of drug (n = 21) or placebo (n = 21) treatment. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioral measures, we determined the drug's effects on brain responses to food images and, separately, on motivation to expend energy to view comparable images.

resultsCompared with placebo, GSK1521498 was associated with a significant reduction in pallidum/putamen responses to pictures of high-calorie food and a reduction in motivation to view images of high-calorie food. Intriguingly, although motivational responding was reduced, subjective liking for the same images actually increased following drug treatment.

conclusionsStimulus-specific putamen/pallidal responses in obese people with binge eating are sensitive to altered mu-opioid function. This neuromodulation was accompanied by reductions in motivational responding, as measured by grip force, although subjective liking responses to the same stimuli actually increased. As well as providing evidence for a link between the opioid system and food-related behavior in binge-eating obese individuals, these results support a dissociation across measures of motivation and liking associated with food-related stimuli in these individuals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBinge-Eating DisorderBrainBrain MappingDouble-Blind MethodFeeding BehaviorFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansIndansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNarcotic AntagonistsIndansN-((3,5-difluoro-3'-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)-4-biphenylyl)methyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-amineNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID23245760
PMCPMC3898083
OpenAlexW1987687653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.