Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23245473›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2012

A participatory and capacity-building approach to healthy eating and physical activity- SCIP-school: a 2-year controlled trial.

Liselotte Schäfer Elinder, Nelleke Heinemans, Jan Hagberg, Anna-Karin Quetel, Maria Hagströmer

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for preventing obesity in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Measuring implementation fidelity of school-based obesity prevention programmes: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physical activity and social connectedness interventions in outdoor spaces among children and youth: a rapid review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liselotte Schäfer ElinderDivision of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. liselotte.schafer-elinder@ki.se
Nelleke Heinemans
Jan Hagberg
Anna-Karin Quetel
Maria Hagströmer
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools can be effective settings for improving eating habits and physical activity, whereas it is more difficult to prevent obesity. A key challenge is the "implementation gap". Trade-off must be made between expert-driven programmes on the one hand and contextual relevance, flexibility, participation and capacity building on the other. The aim of the Stockholm County Implementation Programme was to improve eating habits, physical activity, self-esteem, and promote a healthy body weight in children aged 6-16 years. We describe the programme, intervention fidelity, impacts and outcomes after two years of intervention.

methodsNine out of 18 schools in a middle-class municipality in Sweden agreed to participate whereas the other nine schools served as the comparison group (quasi-experimental study). Tailored action plans were developed by school health teams on the basis of a self-assessment questionnaire called KEY assessing strengths and weaknesses of each school's health practices and environments. Process evaluation was carried out by the research staff. Impacts at school level were assessed yearly by the KEY. Outcome measures at student level were anthropometry (measured), and health behaviours assessed by a questionnaire, at baseline and after 2 years. All children in grade 2, 4 and 7 were invited to participate (n=1359) of which 59.8% consented. The effect of the intervention on health behaviours, self-esteem, weight status and BMIsds was evaluated by unilevel and multilevel regression analysis adjusted for gender and baseline values.

resultsProgramme fidelity was high demonstrating feasibility, but fidelity to school action plans was only 48% after two years. Positive and significant (p<.05) impacts were noted in school health practices and environments after 2 years. At student level no significant intervention effects were seen for the main outcomes.

conclusionsSchool staff has the capacity to create their own solutions and make changes at school level on the basis of self-assessment and facilitation by external agents. However these changes were challenging to sustain over time and had little impact on student behaviours or weight status. Better student outcomes could probably be attained by a more focused and evidence-based approach with stepwise implementation of action plans.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingDietExerciseFeeding BehaviorHealth BehaviorObesitySchool Health ServicesAdolescentBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMotor Activity

Identifiers

PMID23245473
PMCPMC3545832
OpenAlexW2129400948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.