ReviewHuman genomics2012
Gene family matters: expanding the HGNC resource.
Review in Human genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update of the Methyltransferase Gene Family: Classification, Evolution and Biological Functions.Human genomics · 2026Review
- CCIDB: a manually curated cell-cell interaction database with cell context information.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- Integrating gene annotation with orthology inference at scale.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- BioTAGME: A Comprehensive Platform for Biological Knowledge Network Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Signatures of Discriminative Copy Number Aberrations in 31 Cancer Subtypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- GFDP: the gene family database in poplar.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Size distribution of function-based human gene sets and the split-merge model.Royal Society open science · 2016Article
- A review of the new HGNC gene family resource.Human genomics · 2016Review
- FlyBase: establishing a Gene Group resource for Drosophila melanogaster.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- GEISHA: an evolving gene expression resource for the chicken embryo.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2013.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) assigns approved gene symbols to human loci. There are currently over 33,000 approved gene symbols, the majority of which represent protein-coding genes, but we also name other locus types such as non-coding RNAs, pseudogenes and phenotypic loci. Where relevant, the HGNC organise these genes into gene families and groups. The HGNC website http://www.genenames.org/ is an online repository of HGNC-approved gene nomenclature and associated resources for human genes, and includes links to genomic, proteomic and phenotypic information. In addition to this, we also have dedicated gene family web pages and are currently expanding and generating more of these pages using data curated by the HGNC and from information derived from external resources that focus on particular gene families. Here, we review our current online resources with a particular focus on our gene family data, using it to highlight our new Gene Symbol Report and gene family data downloads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.