Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23245198›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2013

Smoking and the bandit: a preliminary study of smoker and nonsmoker differences in exploratory behavior measured with a multiarmed bandit task.

Merideth A Addicott, John M Pearson, Jessica Wilson, Michael L Platt, F Joseph McClernon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  4. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the explore/exploit trade-off.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Individual differences in sequential decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Merideth A AddicottDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3527, Lakeview Pavilion E, Suite 300, Durham, NC 27705, USA. merideth.addicott@duke.edu
John M Pearson
Jessica Wilson
Michael L Platt
F Joseph McClernon

Funding

Animal Model of Genetics and Social Behavior in Autism Spectrum DisordersR01MH096875 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Brain Substrates of Extinction-Based Treatment for Nicotine DependenceR01DA025876 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCLERNON, FRANCIS JOSEPH · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
Neurobiology of Nicotine and Non-nicotine Components of Tobacco AddictionR01DA023516 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCLERNON, FRANCIS JOSEPH · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023516NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025876NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advantageous decision-making is an adaptive trade-off between exploring alternatives and exploiting the most rewarding option. This trade-off may be related to maladaptive decision-making associated with nicotine dependence; however, explore/exploit behavior has not been previously investigated in the context of addiction. The explore/exploit trade-off is captured by the multiarmed bandit task, in which different arms of a slot machine are chosen to discover the relative payoffs. The goal of this study was to preliminarily investigate whether smokers differ from nonsmokers in their degree of exploratory behavior. Smokers (n = 18) and nonsmokers (n = 17) completed a 6-armed bandit task as well as self-report measures of behavior and personality traits. Smokers were found to exhibit less exploratory behavior (i.e., made fewer switches between slot machine arms) than nonsmokers within the first 300 trials of the bandit task. The overall proportion of exploratory choices negatively correlated with self-reported measures of delay aversion and nonplanning impulsivity. These preliminary results suggest that smokers make fewer initial exploratory choices on the bandit task. The bandit task is a promising measure that could provide valuable insights into how nicotine use and dependence is associated with explore/exploit decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingExploratory BehaviorAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceSmoking

Identifiers

PMID23245198
PMCPMC4028629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.