ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2013
The neural basis of nonvisual object recognition memory in the rat.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dissecting novel object exploration in a fully automated homecage-based novel object recognition test.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Cholinergic regulation of object recognition memory.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Review
- Lesion of the hippocampus selectively enhances LEC's activity during recognition memory based on familiarity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Perirhinal Cortex Engages in Area and Layer-Specific Encoding of Item Dimensions.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Involvement of the Postrhinal and Perirhinal Cortices in Microscale and Macroscale Visuospatial Information Encoding.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Detecting and discriminating novel objects: The impact of perirhinal cortex disconnection on hippocampal activity patterns.Hippocampus · 2016Article
- Advances in the behavioural testing and network imaging of rodent recognition memory.Behavioural brain research · 2015Review
- In search of a recognition memory engram.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
- Contrasting networks for recognition memory and recency memory revealed by immediate-early gene imaging in the rat.Behavioral neuroscience · 2014Article
- Dysgranular retrosplenial cortex lesions in rats disrupt cross-modal object recognition.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2014Article
- Dissociation of recognition and recency memory judgments after anterior thalamic nuclei lesions in rats.Behavioral neuroscience · 2013Article
- Differential Cortical c-Fos and Zif-268 Expression after Object and Spatial Memory Processing in a Standard or Episodic-Like Object Recognition Task.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Research into the neural basis of recognition memory has traditionally focused on the remembrance of visual stimuli. The present study examined the neural basis of object recognition memory in the dark, with a view to determining the extent to which it shares common pathways with visual-based object recognition. Experiment 1 assessed the expression of the immediate-early gene c-fos in rats that discriminated novel from familiar objects in the dark (Group Novel). Comparisons made with a control group that explored only familiar objects (Group Familiar) showed that Group Novel had higher c-fos activity in the rostral perirhinal cortex and the lateral entorhinal cortex. Outside the temporal region, Group Novel showed relatively increased c-fos activity in the anterior medial thalamic nucleus and the anterior cingulate cortex. Both the hippocampal CA fields and the granular retrosplenial cortex showed borderline increases in c-fos activity with object novelty. The hippocampal findings prompted Experiment 2. Here, rats with hippocampal lesions were tested in the dark for object recognition memory at different retention delays. Across two replications, no evidence was found that hippocampal lesions impair nonvisual object recognition. The results indicate that in the dark, as in the light, interrelated parahippocampal sites are activated when rats explore novel stimuli. These findings reveal a network of linked c-fos activations that share superficial features with those associated with visual recognition but differ in the fine details; for example, in the locus of the perirhinal cortex activation. While there may also be a relative increase in c-fos activation in the extended-hippocampal system to object recognition in the dark, there was no evidence that this recognition memory problem required an intact hippocampus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.