Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23244259›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2013

Mathematically engineered stromal cell-derived factor-1α stem cell cytokine analog enhances mechanical properties of infarcted myocardium.

John W MacArthur, Alen Trubelja, Yasuhiro Shudo, Philip Hsiao, Alexander S Fairman, Elaine Yang, William Hiesinger, Joseph J Sarver, Pavan Atluri, Y Joseph Woo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Injectable Bioengineered Hydrogel Therapy in the Treatment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John W MacArthurDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Alen Trubelja
Yasuhiro Shudo
Philip Hsiao
Alexander S Fairman
Elaine Yang
William Hiesinger
Joseph J Sarver
Pavan Atluri
Y Joseph Woo
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training Program in Cardiovascular Biology and MedicineT32HL007843 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMAS P. CAPPOLA, Sharlene M Day · 1996 to 2026
$11.0M
ANGIOGENIC TISSUE ENGINEERING TO LIMIT POST-INFARCTION VENTRICULAR REMODELINGR01HL089315 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOO, Y JOSEPH · 2008 to 2023
$6.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL089315-01NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089315NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007843NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007843-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe biomechanical response to a myocardial infarction consists of ventricular remodeling that leads to dilatation, loss of contractile function, abnormal stress patterns, and ultimately heart failure. We hypothesized that intramyocardial injection of our previously designed pro-angiogenic chemokine, an engineered stromal cell-derived factor-1α analog (ESA), improves mechanical properties of the heart after infarction.

methodsMale rats (n = 54) underwent either sham surgery (n = 17) with no coronary artery ligation or ligation of the left anterior descending artery (n = 37). The rats in the myocardial infarction group were then randomized to receive either saline (0.1 mL, n = 18) or ESA (6 μg/kg, n = 19) injected into the myocardium at 4 predetermined spots around the border zone. Echocardiograms were performed preoperatively and before the terminal surgery. After 4 weeks, the hearts were explanted and longitudinally sectioned. Uniaxial tensile testing was completed using an Instron 5543 Microtester. Optical strain was evaluated using custom image acquisition software, Digi-Velpo, and analyzed in MATLAB.

resultsCompared with the saline control group at 4 weeks, the ESA-injected hearts had a greater ejection fraction (71.8% ± 9.0% vs 55.3% ± 12.6%, P = .0004), smaller end-diastolic left ventricular internal dimension (0.686 ± 0.110 cm vs 0.763 ± 0.160 cm, P = .04), greater cardiac output (36 ± 11.6 mL/min vs 26.9 ± 7.3 mL/min, P = .05), and a lower tensile modulus (251 ± 56 kPa vs 301 ± 81 kPa, P = .04). The tensile modulus for the sham group was 195 ± 56 kPa, indicating ESA injection results in a less stiff ventricle.

conclusionsDirect injection of ESA alters the biomechanical response to myocardial infarction, improving the mechanical properties in the postinfarct heart.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCardiotonic AgentsChemokine CXCL12Computer-Aided DesignDisease Models, AnimalDrug DesignInjectionsMaleMyocardial ContractionMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumRatsRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionStroke VolumeCardiotonic AgentsChemokine CXCL12

Identifiers

PMID23244259
PMCPMC4134128
OpenAlexW2051991058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.