Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23244204›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2012

Lens regeneration in axolotl: new evidence of developmental plasticity.

Rinako Suetsugu-Maki, Nobuyasu Maki, Kenta Nakamura, Saulius Sumanas, Jie Zhu, Katia Del Rio-Tsonis, Panagiotis A Tsonis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rewinding the clock: mechanisms of dedifferentiation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hallmarks of regeneration.Cell stem cell · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Salamanders as Key Models for Development and Regeneration Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. The Diverse Manifestations of Regeneration and Why We Need to Study Them.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The rax homeobox gene is mutated in the eyeless axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rinako Suetsugu-MakiDepartment of Biology and Center for Tissue Regeneration and Engineering, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-2320, USA.
Nobuyasu Maki
Kenta Nakamura
Saulius Sumanas
Jie Zhu
Katia Del Rio-Tsonis
Panagiotis A Tsonis
Miami University · USUniversity of Dayton · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USOsaka University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

GENE REGULATION IN LENS REGENERATIONR01EY010540 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON · PI TSONIS, PANAGIOTIS A · 1995 to 2013
$3.3M
Signaling pathways during chick retina regenerationR01EY017319 · NEI · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI DEL RIO-TSONIS, KATIA · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY10540NEI NIH HHS EY 17319NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong vertebrates lens regeneration is most pronounced in newts, which have the ability to regenerate the entire lens throughout their lives. Regeneration occurs from the dorsal iris by transdifferentiation of the pigment epithelial cells. Interestingly, the ventral iris never contributes to regeneration. Frogs have limited lens regeneration capacity elicited from the cornea during pre-metamorphic stages. The axolotl is another salamander which, like the newt, regenerates its limbs or its tail with the spinal cord, but up until now all reports have shown that it does not regenerate the lens.

resultsHere we present a detailed analysis during different stages of axolotl development, and we show that despite previous beliefs the axolotl does regenerate the lens, however, only during a limited time after hatching. We have found that starting at stage 44 (forelimb bud stage) lens regeneration is possible for nearly two weeks. Regeneration occurs from the iris but, in contrast to the newt, regeneration can be elicited from either the dorsal or the ventral iris and, occasionally, even from both in the same eye. Similar studies in the zebra fish concluded that lens regeneration is not possible.

conclusionsRegeneration of the lens is possible in the axolotl, but differs from both frogs and newts. Thus the axolotl iris provides a novel and more plastic strategy for lens regeneration.

Indexed as

Ambystoma mexicanumAnimalsCell ProliferationEmbryo, NonmammalianHeadLarvaLens, CrystallineRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID23244204
PMCPMC3554534
OpenAlexW1997550118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.