Copper Sensing with a Prion Protein Modified Nanopipette.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Recent Advances in Nanopore Technology for Copper Detection and Their Potential Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
2. Nanoneedle-Based Materials for Intracellular Studies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
   Article
3. Bioinspired integrated nanosystems based on solid-state nanopores: "Chemical science · 2017
   Article
4. Nanopore Sensing.Analytical chemistry · 2017
   Review
5. Carbohydrate-actuated nanofluidic diode: switchable current rectification in a nanopipette.Nanoscale · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract