Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23242897›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2012

Patients' experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings.

Janie Houle, Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, Marie-Thérèse Lussier, Claudio Del Grande, Jean-Pierre Pellerin, Marie Authier, Réjean Duplain, Tri Minh Tran, François Allison

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Type 2 diabetes: patient assessment of chronic illness care.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient experience on self-management support among primary care patients with diabetes and hypertension.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing quality: giving patients a voice.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Janie HouleDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, PO Box 8888, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8. houle.janie@uqam.ca
Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
Marie-Thérèse Lussier
Claudio Del Grande
Jean-Pierre Pellerin
Marie Authier
Réjean Duplain
Tri Minh Tran
François Allison

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate chronic illness care delivery from the patient's perspective and to examine its main correlates.

designCross-sectional, descriptive study using questionnaires and medical chart review.

settingNine teaching family practices in Quebec.

participantsA total of 364 patients with diabetes, hypertension, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Score on the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire, which evaluates the patient's perspective on the care received based on the chronic care model (CCM); patients characteristics (sex, level of education, number of chronic illnesses); patient-physician relationship (relational continuity, interpersonal communication assessed from the patient's perspective); and interdisciplinary care and technical quality of care abstracted from patients' medical charts.

resultsThe mean PACIC score obtained (2.8 out of 5) indicates that, on average, CCM-concordant care "generally did not occur" or occurred only "sometimes" in this network of teaching practices. However, with a mean technical quality-of-care score of nearly 80%, physicians in this network showed a high degree of adherence to clinical guidelines for the chronic illnesses under study. Patient education level lower than high school was negatively associated with PACIC scores, while positive associations were found with male sex, number of chronic illnesses, relational continuity, interpersonal communication, interdisciplinary care, and technical quality of care.

conclusionPatients with less education reported receiving less CCM-concordant care. The patient-physician relationship was the strongest correlate of PACIC scores, while interdisciplinary care and technical quality of care had modest contributions.

Indexed as

AgedAttitude to HealthChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Educational StatusFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansHypertensionInterdisciplinary CommunicationLinear ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23242897
PMCPMC3520666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.