Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23242740›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2013

Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: is warfarin still an option?--No.

R Lakshmi Narasimhan Ranganathan, P Venkatesh

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R Lakshmi Narasimhan RanganathanInstitute of Neurology, Chennai, India, lakshmineuro@gmail.com.
P Venkatesh
Sir Ivan Stedeford Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke by 4.5 times. Anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation has been inconsistent and inappropriate. Warfarin enjoyed the monopoly of being the primary medication used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events. Warfarin has many limitations in its use as an ideal anticoagulant. To overcome this difficulty, now there are two main alternative groups to warfarin namely, direct thrombin inhibitors (ximelagatran and dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, etc.). The advantages of the newer anticoagulants over the conventional warfarin are numerous. There are three landmark trials which have shown some light to the path of newer anticoagulant era, which include the following: RE-LY, ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE. Head to head comparison of warfarin with newer anticoagulants showed the superiority of newer anticoagulants over warfarin in terms of efficacy and favorable side effect profile. After few decades of using warfarin, it's high time to enter into the era of newer anticoagulants and bid adieu to warfarin.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationHumansStrokeWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID23242740
OpenAlexW2155771665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.