ArticleIrish journal of medical science2013
Evolving changes in the management of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a tertiary centre.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Appraisal of staging endoscopic ultrasonography in a modern high-volume esophageal program.World journal of surgery · 2013Trial
- Impact of the development of an endoscopic eradication program for Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma on the frequency of surgery.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- Endoscopic mucosal resection for staging and treatment of early esophageal carcinoma: a single institution experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSeries from high volume oesophageal centres highlight an increasing prevalence of early malignant (EM) lesions. The advent of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offer alternatives to traditional surgery. The evolution of this pattern of care in a high volume centre is analysed.
methodsData were collected from a prospectively maintained database. 96 patients were treated with an EM lesion from 2000 to 2011. Surgery was the standard approach during the initial period (2000-2006). In 2007, with the introduction of EMR±RFA to our Centre, a rising trend toward definitive endoscopic treatment was seen. This study details the selection of cases into treatment groups and their outcomes.
resultsFrom 2000 to 2006, 23 patients were treated with EM lesions, 96% by surgery. Seventy-three were treated from 2007 to 2011, 55% surgically and 45% by EMR±RFA. In the entire experience, there was one death from surgery and morbidity was higher in the surgery group compared with EMR±RFA (p<0.001). Three surgical patients (4.8%) relapsed with HGD or cancer, and one patient with T1N1 disease died of disease recurrence. At a median of 13 months, EMR±RFA offered 100% disease control, 72% had no endoscopic or histological evidence of Barrett's oesophagus and one patient represented with low grade dysplasia.
conclusionsThis study highlights the changing pattern of care in the management of early oesophageal cancer. EMR±RFA appears an acceptable alternative to surgery in carefully selected cases. However, long-term outcome analysis using these methods is required and close interdisciplinary collaboration of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, pathology and radiology is mandatory to achieve optimum outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.