Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23242563›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2013

Impact of patient navigation on cancer diagnostic resolution among Northwest Tribal communities.

Victoria Warren-Mears, Jenine Dankovchik, Meena Patil, Rongwei Fu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Can patient navigation improve receipt of recommended breast cancer care? Evidence from the National Patient Navigation Research Program.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Trial
  3. Pilot implementation and qualitative evaluation of a financial hardship screening among Native American patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of the Indigenous Patient Navigator: A Scoping Review.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Satisfaction with cancer care among American Indian and Alaska Natives in Oregon and Washington State: a qualitative study of survivor and caregiver perspectives.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Effect of patient navigation on time to diagnostic resolution among patients with colorectal cancer-related abnormalities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria Warren-MearsNorthwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, OR 97201, USA. vwarrenmears@npaihb.org
Jenine Dankovchik
Meena Patil
Rongwei Fu

Funding

Northwest Tribal Cancer Navigator ProgramU01CA116925 · NCI · NORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HLTH BD · PI WARREN-MEARS, VICTORIA ANN · 2005 to 2009
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116925NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116925-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patient navigator model has not been widely implemented in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities, but may be effective in improving cancer outcomes for this population. Subjects were enrolled from eight clinics at Tribes throughout the Northwest (n = 1,187). Four clinics received navigation. Time between abnormal finding and definitive diagnosis was recorded. We examined whether odds of obtaining definitive diagnosis by 60, 90, and 365 days differed between the two groups. The odds of definitive diagnosis within 365 days for navigated subjects was 3.6 times (95 % CI, 1.47, 8.88; p = 0.01) the odds for control subjects. The outcome at 60 and 90 days did not significantly differ between the two groups. Our findings indicate that patient navigation did not significantly impact chance of diagnosis by 60 or 90 days from abnormal finding. However, it did improve the chance of avoiding extreme delays in obtaining a definitive diagnosis.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPatient NavigationAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMiddle AgedMinority HealthNeoplasmsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23242563
PMCPMC3610770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.