Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23242278›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2013

To BRAF or not to BRAF: is that even a question anymore?

Craig Horbinski

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Synopsis of Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Past and Present.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Benign Spinal Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Neurosurgical experience of managing optic pathway gliomas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig HorbinskiDepartment of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA. craig.horbinski@uky.edu
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF EPIGENETIC TRANSCRIPTIONAL SILENCINGP20RR020171 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WATT, DAVID · 2004 to 2011
$16.5M
The Significance of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations in GliomasK08CA155764 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HORBINSKI, CRAIG MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$857k
NCI NIH HHS 1-K08 CA155764-01A1NCI NIH HHS K08 CA155764NCRR NIH HHS 2P20 RR020171NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in BRAF have been discovered in most pediatric low-grade gliomas. Because the field has moved quickly during the past few years, there is not yet widespread awareness about what B-Raf normally does, how the BRAF gene is modified in gliomas, why mutant proteins promote gliomagenesis, and what an abnormal BRAF result means for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Depending on the data from ongoing clinical trials, however, BRAF mutation screening could quickly become mandatory for all pediatric gliomas and perhaps even a subset of adult gliomas. Herein, these topics and different methods of testing for BRAF fusions and V600E point mutations are reviewed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsChildGliomaHumansPoint MutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSignal TransductionBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID23242278
PMCPMC3530158
OpenAlexW1988017366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.