Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23242270›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2013

Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez, José Manuel Díaz-Pavón, Fernando de la Portilla de Juan, Emilio Prendes-Sillero, Hisnard Cadet Dussort, Javier Padillo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04015804 (European Ambispective Cohort of Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Robotic Low Anterior Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04015804 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

European Ambispective Cohort of Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Robotic Low Anterior Resection

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2015 to 2025Enrolled833ConditionsRectum CancerArmsClinical database
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.International journal of colorectal disease · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Pooled it
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosa M Jiménez-RodríguezDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, C/Jándula 2, Bl-3, P-3, 4º2, 41013, Sevilla, Spain. ros_j_r@hotmail.com
José Manuel Díaz-Pavón
Fernando de la Portilla de Juan
Emilio Prendes-Sillero
Hisnard Cadet Dussort
Javier Padillo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the main uses of robotic assisted abdominal surgery is the mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of the present study is to analyse the learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe included in our study 43 consecutive rectal cancer resections (16 females and 27 males) performed from January 2008 through December 2010. Mean age of patients was 66 ± 9.0 years. Surgical procedures included both abdomino-perineal and anterior resections. We analysed the following parameters: demographic data of the patients included in the study, intra- and postoperative data, time taking to set up the robot for operations (set-up or docking time), operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rates and pathological specimen features. The learning curve was analysed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology.

resultsThe procedures understudied included seven abdomino-perineal resections and 36 anterior resections. In our series of patients, mean robotic set-up time was 62.9 ± 24.6 min, and the mean operative time was 197.4 ± 44.3 min. Once we applied CUSUM methodology, we obtained two graphs for CUSUM values (operating time and success), both of them showing three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (the initial 9-11 cases), phase 2 (the middle 12 cases) and phase 3 (the remaining 20-22 cases). Phase 1 represents initial learning; phase 2 plateau represents increased competence in the use of the robotic system, and finally, phase 3 represents the period of highest skill or mastery with a reduction in docking time (p = 0.000), but a slight increase in operative time (p = 0.007).

conclusionThe CUSUM curve shows three phases in the learning and use of robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery which correspond to the phases of initial learning of the technique, consolidation and higher expertise or mastery. The data obtained suggest that the estimated learning curve for robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery is achieved after 21-23 cases.

Indexed as

Learning CurveAgedDemographyFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareLaparoscopyMaleNeoplasm StagingOperative TimePostoperative CareRectal NeoplasmsRoboticsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.