ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2013
Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04015804 (European Ambispective Cohort of Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Robotic Low Anterior Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
European Ambispective Cohort of Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Robotic Low Anterior Resection
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis with comparison against published systematic reviews.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Learning curve of robotic colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical proficiency, outcomes, and training protocols.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the efficacy of Da Vinci robotic or laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.Medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Pooled it
- Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of robotic colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Pooled it
- Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.International journal of colorectal disease · 2016Pooled it
- Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2014Pooled it
- Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014Pooled it
- Beyond total operative time: phase-specific robotic efficiency and postoperative morbidity following colorectal resection - a multisurgeon cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Learning Curve of Da Vinci Xi Robotic Low Anterior Resection: A Cumulative Sum Analysis of a Single High-Volume Surgeon.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of single-port robotic surgery versus single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a multicenter matched-cohort analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: A national two-centre study.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Learning Curve for Robotic Colorectal Surgery.Cancers · 2024Review
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOne of the main uses of robotic assisted abdominal surgery is the mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of the present study is to analyse the learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe included in our study 43 consecutive rectal cancer resections (16 females and 27 males) performed from January 2008 through December 2010. Mean age of patients was 66 ± 9.0 years. Surgical procedures included both abdomino-perineal and anterior resections. We analysed the following parameters: demographic data of the patients included in the study, intra- and postoperative data, time taking to set up the robot for operations (set-up or docking time), operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rates and pathological specimen features. The learning curve was analysed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology.
resultsThe procedures understudied included seven abdomino-perineal resections and 36 anterior resections. In our series of patients, mean robotic set-up time was 62.9 ± 24.6 min, and the mean operative time was 197.4 ± 44.3 min. Once we applied CUSUM methodology, we obtained two graphs for CUSUM values (operating time and success), both of them showing three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (the initial 9-11 cases), phase 2 (the middle 12 cases) and phase 3 (the remaining 20-22 cases). Phase 1 represents initial learning; phase 2 plateau represents increased competence in the use of the robotic system, and finally, phase 3 represents the period of highest skill or mastery with a reduction in docking time (p = 0.000), but a slight increase in operative time (p = 0.007).
conclusionThe CUSUM curve shows three phases in the learning and use of robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery which correspond to the phases of initial learning of the technique, consolidation and higher expertise or mastery. The data obtained suggest that the estimated learning curve for robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery is achieved after 21-23 cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23242270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.