Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241953›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2013

The genu effect on plantar flexor power.

Brian H Dalton, Geoffrey A Power, Matti D Allen, Anthony A Vandervoort, Charles L Rice

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian H DaltonSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging, London, ON, Canada. bdalton@mail.ubc.ca
Geoffrey A Power
Matti D Allen
Anthony A Vandervoort
Charles L Rice

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triceps surae function can be modified by changes in knee joint angle through altering the effective contribution of the bi-articular gastrocnemeii. However, the impact on plantar flexor power from altering knee angle has not been studied systematically across a range of loads. Here, in 11 young men (25.7 ± 2.2 years), we determine the effect of knee angle on torque, velocity and power at loads ranging from 15 to 75 % maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). Contractile properties were recorded with either the knee extended (170º) or flexed (90º). Despite similar voluntary activation (~97 %), peak twitch and MVC torques were 25 and 16 % lower in the flexed than extended knee (P < 0.05), respectively. Across all loads, subjects were 15-24 % less powerful with the knee flexed than extended (P < 0.05). In the flexed knee at relative loads ≤30 % MVC, impaired power was accompanied by 6-9 % slower shortening velocities than the extended knee. However, for the higher loads, limited torque production in the flexed knee was the key factor contributing to the generation of maximal power than for the extended position. This was supported by no change in velocity at higher loads (>30 % MVC) and a 15-22 % lower maximal rate of torque development across all loads. Hence, in a flexed knee position, which disadvantages the contribution of the gastrocnemeii, results in a left-downward shift in the torque-power relationship impairing maximal power production. Thus, the gastrocnemeii are not only a major contributor to plantar flexion torque, but also critical for modifying loaded shortening velocity and ultimately power production.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionAdultFootHumansJointsKneeMaleMuscle, SkeletalTorque

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.