Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241895›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2013

Dementia and neuroimaging.

Federica Agosta, Francesca Caso, Massimo Filippi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CSF-based liquid biopsy pointing to a diagnosis of diffuse glioma in a patient with supposed neurodegenerative disorder.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neurological update: dementia.Journal of neurology · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federica AgostaNeuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Francesca Caso
Massimo Filippi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of dementing conditions and an accurate monitoring of their progression are important clinical and research goals, especially given the improving prospects of disease-modifying therapies. Neuroimaging has played and is playing an important role in detecting reversible, treatable causes of dementia, and in characterizing the dementia syndromes by demonstrating structural and functional signatures that can aid in their differentiation. Many new imaging techniques and modalities are also available that allow the assessment of specific aspects of brain structure and function, such as positron emission tomography with new ligands, diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. In this review, we report the most recent findings from the papers published in the Journal of Neurology that used conventional and advanced neuroimaging techniques for the study of various dementing conditions.

Indexed as

DementiaHumansNeuroimaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.