Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241739›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2013

In a high-dose melphalan setting, palifermin compared with placebo had no effect on oral mucositis or related patient's burden.

N Blijlevens, M de Château, G Krivan, W Rabitsch, A Szomor, R Pytlik, A Lissmats, H E Johnsen, T de Witte, H Einsele and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of growth factors and cytokines for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Oral mucositis management in hematopoietic cell transplantation in Australia and New Zealand (CAN EAT Survey).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Optimizing high dose melphalan.Blood reviews · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Burden of oral mucositis in stem cell transplant patients-the patients' perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

N BlijlevensDepartment of Haematology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. n.blijlevens@hemat.umcn.nl
M de Château
G Krivan
W Rabitsch
A Szomor
R Pytlik
A Lissmats
H E Johnsen
T de Witte
H Einsele
T Ruutu
D Niederwieser
CLWP of the EBMT
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sweden) · SEAalborg University Hospital · DKGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZHelsinki University Hospital · FIKlinikum Würzburg Mitte · DELeipzig University · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUnified Szent István and Szent László Hospital · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized-controlled trial studied the efficacy of palifermin in a chemotherapy-only, high-dose Melphalan (HDM) transplant setting, to reduce oral mucositis (OM) and its sequelae measured by patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and medical resource use. Palifermin, relative to placebo was given either pre-/post-HDM or pre-HDM in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing auto-SCT at 39 European centers. Oral cavity assessment (WHO) and PRO questionnaires (oral mucositis daily questionnaire (OMDQ) and EQ 5D) were used in 281 patients (mean age 56, ± s.d.=8 years). 57 patients received placebo. One hundred and fifteen subjects were randomized to pre-/post-HDM receiving palifermin on 3 consecutive days before HDM and after auto-SCT and 109 patients were randomized to pre-HDM, receiving palifermin (60 μg/kg/day) i.v. for 3 consecutive days before HDM. There was no statistically significant difference in maximum OM severity. Severe OM occurred in 37% (placebo), 38% (pre-/post-HDM) and 24% (pre-HDM) of patients. No significant difference was observed with respect to PRO assessments or medical resource use, but more infections and fever during neutropenia were reported in pre-/post-HDM vs placebo (for example, 51 and 26%). To conclude, palifermin was unable to reduce OM or OM-related patient's burden in MM transplant patients.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningAdolescentAdultAgedAutograftsFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 7Follow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaMyeloablative AgonistsStomatitisFibroblast Growth Factor 7MelphalanMyeloablative Agonists

Identifiers

PMID23241739
OpenAlexW1991303674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.