Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241442›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

Distinct mutational behaviors differentiate short tandem repeats from microsatellites in the human genome.

Guruprasad Ananda, Erin Walsh, Kimberly D Jacob, Maria Krasilnikova, Kristin A Eckert, Francesca Chiaromonte, Kateryna D Makova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Zimin patterns in genomes.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microsatellite Stability in STR AnalysisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guruprasad AnandaIntegrative Biosciences, Bioinformatics and Genomics Option, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA.
Erin Walsh
Kimberly D Jacob
Maria Krasilnikova
Kristin A Eckert
Francesca Chiaromonte
Kateryna D Makova
Pennsylvania State University · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Computational and Biochemical Analysis of Microsatellite Life CycleR01GM087472 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A, MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM087472NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A tandem repeat's (TR) propensity to mutate increases with repeat number, and can become very pronounced beyond a critical boundary, transforming it into a microsatellite (MS). However, a clear understanding of the mutational behavior of different TR classes and motifs and related mechanisms is lacking, as is a consensus on the existence of a boundary separating short TRs (STRs) from MSs. This hinders our understanding of MSs' mutational properties and their effective use as genetic markers. Using indel calls for 179 individuals from 1000 Genomes Pilot-1 Project, we determined polymorphism incidence for four major TR classes, and formalized its varying relationship with repeat number using segmented regression. We observed a biphasic regime with a transition from a faster to a slower exponential growth at 9, 5, 4, and 4 repeats for mono-, di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide TRs, respectively. We used an in vitro mutagenesis assay to evaluate the contribution of strand slippage errors to mutability. STRs and MSs differ in their absolute polymorphism levels, but more importantly in their rates of mutability growth. Although strand slippage is a major factor driving mononucleotide polymorphism incidence, dinucleotide polymorphism incidence is greater than that expected due to strand slippage alone, indicating that additional cellular factors might be driving dinucleotide mutability in the human genome. Leveraging on hundreds of human genomes, we present the first comprehensive, genome-wide analysis of TR mutational behavior, encompassing several motif sizes and compositions.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanMicrosatellite RepeatsMutationEvolution, MolecularHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID23241442
PMCPMC3622297
OpenAlexW2137389318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.