SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2012
Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of chronic kidney disease on outcomes after total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.International orthopaedics · 2020Pooled it
- [Personality and comorbidity: are there "difficult patients" in hip arthroplasty?].Der Orthopade · 2015Pooled it
- Bisphosphonate Use and Risk of Implant Revision after Total Hip/Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- What Is Important to the Younger Person (≤50 Years) When Having a Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review.Orthopedic nursingPooled it
- Review of the influence of anaemia on the effect of total hip arthroplasty, and the prognosis of patients: recent advances and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Infection, Fracture, and Repeat Revision After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty; Prealbumin Stratification Does Not Refine Risk: A Retrospective Database Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Extra-long femoral heads as a surrogate marker for revision risk in primary total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Type 2 diabetes is not associated with excess risk of periprosthetic joint infection in obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Why revision of total hip arthroplasty fails: a retrospective consecutive cohort study of 963 patients.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Association of Testosterone Supplementation with the Risk of Infection following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip & pelvis · 2025Article
- Total joint arthroplasty patients who experience the minimal clinically important difference for worsening (MCID-W) have higher revision rates at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Head via Surgical Hip Dislocation: Survivorship and Patient Reported Outcome Measures at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Bilateral Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head and Proximal Femur After Corticosteroid Injections: A Case Report.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- The Role of the 'Femur First' Technique and Spinopelvic Characteristics in Achieving the Combined Sagittal Index in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results from a Retrospective Tertiary-Center Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after hip and knee replacement surgery: study protocol for a comparison of modelling approaches using the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS).Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2025Review
- Short-Term Complications of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty of the Acetabular, Femoral, or Both Components: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Impact of low body mass index on reoperation risk and complications after joint arthroplasty: a cohort study.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Which B2 Fractures Can Be Treated with ORIF? Validation of the "Beyond the Vancouver Classification".Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Effects of Physiological Loading from Patient-Derived Activities of Daily Living on the Wear of Metal-on-Polymer Total Hip Replacements.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNumerous papers have been published examining risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but there have been no comprehensive systematic literature reviews that summarize the most recent findings across a broad range of potential predictors.
methodsWe performed a PubMed search for papers published between January, 2000 and November, 2010 that provided data on risk factors for revision of primary THA. We collected data on revision for any reason, as well as on revision for aseptic loosening, infection, or dislocation. For each risk factor that was examined in at least three papers, we summarize the number and direction of statistically significant associations reported.
resultsEighty-six papers were included in our review. Factors found to be associated with revision included younger age, greater comorbidity, a diagnosis of avascular necrosis (AVN) as compared to osteoarthritis (OA), low surgeon volume, and larger femoral head size. Male sex was associated with revision due to aseptic loosening and infection. Longer operating time was associated with revision due to infection. Smaller femoral head size was associated with revision due to dislocation.
conclusionsThis systematic review of literature published between 2000 and 2010 identified a range of demographic, clinical, surgical, implant, and provider variables associated with the risk of revision following primary THA. These findings can inform discussions between surgeons and patients relating to the risks and benefits of undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.