Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241162›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012

CancerMA: a web-based tool for automatic meta-analysis of public cancer microarray data.

Julia Feichtinger, Ramsay J McFarlane, Lee D Larcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CD90/Thy-1, a Cancer-Associated Cell Surface Signaling Molecule.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human cancer databases (review).Oncology reports · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CancerEST: a web-based tool for automatic meta-analysis of public EST data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia FeichtingerNorth West Cancer Research Fund Institute, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK. julia.feichtinger@gmail.com
Ramsay J McFarlane
Lee D Larcombe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of novel candidate markers is a key challenge in the development of cancer therapies. This can be facilitated by putting accessible and automated approaches analysing the current wealth of 'omic'-scale data in the hands of researchers who are directly addressing biological questions. Data integration techniques and standardized, automated, high-throughput analyses are needed to manage the data available as well as to help narrow down the excessive number of target gene possibilities presented by modern databases and system-level resources. Here we present CancerMA, an online, integrated bioinformatic pipeline for automated identification of novel candidate cancer markers/targets; it operates by means of meta-analysing expression profiles of user-defined sets of biologically significant and related genes across a manually curated database of 80 publicly available cancer microarray datasets covering 13 cancer types. A simple-to-use web interface allows bioinformaticians and non-bioinformaticians alike to initiate new analyses as well as to view and retrieve the meta-analysis results. The functionality of CancerMA is shown by means of two validation datasets.

Indexed as

Access to InformationDatabases, GeneticInternetMeta-Analysis as TopicOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAutomationComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsUser-Computer InterfaceWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID23241162
PMCPMC3522872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.