Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241132›Full record

ReviewPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2013

The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Justin Upp, Michael Kent, Patrick J Tighe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Shared Decision-Making in Acute Pain Services.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Risk factors associated with persistent chronic opioid use following THA.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acute pain medicine in anesthesiology.F1000prime reports · 2013
    Review
  16. A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin UppWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michael Kent
Patrick J Tighe
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · USFlorida College · US

Funding

UF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR029890 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2009 to 2011
$14.4M
Use of Machine Learning Classifiers to Forecast Severe Acute Postoperative Pain FK23GM102697 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TIGHE, PATRICK J · 2012 to 2015
$573k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029890NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM 102697NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM102697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the field of acute pain medicine (APM) has witnessed a surge in its development, and pain has begun to be recognized not merely as a symptom, but as an actual disease process. This development warrants increased education of residents both in the performance of regional anesthesia as well as in the disease course of acute pain and the biopsychosocial mechanisms that define interindividual variability. REVIEW SUMMARY: We reviewed the organization and function of the modern APM program. Following a discussion of the nomenclature of acute pain-related practices, we discuss the historical evolution and modern role of APM teams, including the use of traditional, as well as complementary and alternative, therapies for treating acute pain. Staffing and equipment requirements are also evaluated, in addition to the training requirements for achieving expertise in APM. Lastly, we briefly explore future considerations related to the essential role and development of APM.

conclusionThe scope and practice of APM must be expanded to include pre-pain/pre-intervention risk stratification and extended through the phase of subacute pain.

Indexed as

Acute PainHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID23241132
PMCPMC3547126
OpenAlexW1581274200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.