Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23241069›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug safety2013

A review of the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs.

Stephanie Aleskow Stein, Elizabeth Mary Lamos, Stephen N Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The efficacy and safety ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Antidiabetic Potential of Sea UrchinCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Mechanisms of gypenosides in type 2 diabetes mellitus via regulation of m6A methylase METTL3/14 and demethylase FTO.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Enhanced Bioactivity of FermentedCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Stephanie Aleskow SteinUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 22 South Greene St. N3W157, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Elizabeth Mary Lamos
Stephen N Davis
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

YOHIMBINE AS A MODEL OF ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCEM01RR000095 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DRAKE, WONDER P. · 1985 to 2008
$38.3M
Structural genomics of norepinephrine transportersP01HL056693 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROBERTSON, DAVID HERLIE · 1997 to 2016
$30.8M
JHU-UMD Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079637 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AHIMA, REXFORD S. · 2013 to 2017
$9.7M
Hypoglycemia Associated Autonomic Failure in Type 1 DMR01DK069803 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, STEPHEN N. · 2004 to 2008
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000095NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL056693NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079637NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdditional oral antidiabetic agents to metformin, sulfonylureas (SU) and thiazolidinediones (TZD) are approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. AREAS COVERED: The efficacy and safety of metformin, SUs, TZDs, dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitors, meglitinide analogs, α-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs), bile-acid sequestrants (BAS) and bromocriptine will be reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Several new oral agents have been approved for type 2 diabetes management in recent years. It is important to understand the efficacy and safety of these medications in addition to the older agents to best maximize oral drug therapy for diabetes. Of the recently introduced oral hypoglycemic/antihyperglycemic agents, the DPP-4 inhibitors are moderately efficacious compared with mainstay treatment with metformin with a low side-effect profile and have good efficacy in combination with other oral agents and insulin. They are a recommended alternative when metformin use is limited by gastrointestinal (GI) side effects or when SU treatment results in significant hypoglycemia or weight gain. Meglitinide analogs are limited by their frequent dosing, expense and hypoglycemia (repaglinide > nateglinide), while AGIs are also limited by their dosing schedule and GI side-effect profile. BAS and bromocriptine have the lowest efficacy with regard to HbA(1c) reduction, also are plagued by GI adverse reactions, but have a low risk of hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminTreatment OutcomeHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID23241069
PMCPMC3977601
OpenAlexW2167706579

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.