Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23240940›Full record

ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2013

Safety survey of intranasal glutathione.

Laurie K Mischley, Marco F Vespignani, John S Finnell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02324426 (Central Nervous System Uptake of Intranasal Glutathione in Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02324426 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Central Nervous System Uptake of Intranasal Glutathione in Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2014 to 2015Enrolled15ConditionsParkinson's DiseaseArmsReduced Glutathione
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A randomized, double-blind phase I/IIa study of intranasal glutathione in Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2015
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Nose-to-brain drug delivery: from bench to bedside.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurie K MischleyBastyr University Research Institute , Kenmore, WA 98028, USA. lmischley@bastyr.edu
Marco F Vespignani
John S Finnell
Bastyr University · US

Funding

Training in Complementary and Alternative Medical ResearchT32AT000815 · NCCIH · BASTYR UNIVERSITY · PI STANDISH, LEANNA J · 2002 to 2011
$3.2M
Intranasal Glutathione in Parkinson's DiseaseK01AT004404 · NCCIH · BASTYR UNIVERSITY · PI MISCHLEY, LAURIE KATHERN · 2010 to 2014
$589k
NCCIH NIH HHS K01 AT004404NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT000815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlutathione depletion has been documented in several disease states, and exogenous administration has been hypothesized to have therapeutic potential for some conditions. In an effort to reach target tissues of the sinuses and central nervous system (CNS), glutathione is being prescribed as an intranasal spray, although no literature exists to support this mode of administration. The objective of this study was to describe patient-reported outcomes in a population of individuals who have been prescribed intranasal reduced glutathione, (in)GSH.

methodsA survey was designed to assess individuals' perception of tolerability, adverse events, and health benefits associated with (in)GSH use. Using a pharmacy database, 300 individuals were randomly selected to receive a survey; any individual who had received one or more prescriptions for (in)GSH between March 2009 and March 2011 was eligible for participation.

resultsSeventy (70) individuals returned the survey (23.3% response rate) from 20 different states. Reported indications for (in)GSH prescriptions were multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) (n=29), allergies/sinusitis (n=25), Parkinson disease (PD) (n=7), Lyme disease (n=3), fatigue (n=2), and other (n=10). Of the respondents, 78.8% (n=52) reported an overall positive experience with (in)GSH, 12.1% (n=8) reported having experienced adverse effects, and 62.1% (n=41) reported having experienced health benefits attributable to (in)GSH use. Over 86% of respondents considered the nasal spray to be comfortable and easy to administer.

conclusionsThis is the first study to evaluate patient-reported outcomes among individuals across the country who have been prescribed (in)GSH. The majority of survey respondents considered (in)GSH to be effective and without significant adverse effects. (in)GSH should be further evaluated as a method of treating respiratory and CNS diseases where free-radical burden is a suspected contributor to disease progression.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGlutathioneHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Chemical SensitivityNasal SpraysParkinson DiseasePatient SatisfactionProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRespiratory HypersensitivitySinusitisYoung AdultGlutathioneNasal Sprays

Identifiers

PMID23240940
PMCPMC3651682
OpenAlexW2003879111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.