Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23240711›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2013

Subjective response to alcohol among alcohol-dependent individuals: effects of the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1) gene and alcoholism severity.

Lara A Ray, Spencer Bujarski, James MacKillop, Kelly E Courtney, Peter M Monti, Karen Miotto

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lara A RayDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1563, USA. lararay@psych.ucla.edu
Spencer Bujarski
James MacKillop
Kelly E Courtney
Peter M Monti
Karen Miotto
University of California, Los Angeles · USBrown University · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

ZDV &3TC NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFECTED INFANTS &M01RR000865 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WASHINGTON, ARNOLD E. · 1985 to 2011
$43.4M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
Enhancing Alcoholism Pharmacotherapy Research via Behavioral EconomicsK23AA016936 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MACKILLOP, JAMES · 2008 to 2012
$805k
Integrating Laboratory Neuroimaging PhenotypesR03AA019569 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAY, LARA A. · 2009 to 2010
$77k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000865NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00865NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA016936NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA019569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubjective response to alcohol has been examined as a marker of alcoholism risk. The A118G single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1) gene has been previously associated with subjective response to alcohol in heavy drinkers. This study seeks to extend the literature by examining the effect of OPRM1 genotype on responses to alcohol in a sample of alcohol-dependent individuals. A secondary aim of this study is to examine alcoholism severity as a predictor of subjective responses to alcohol.

methodsNontreatment seeking problem drinkers (n = 295) were assessed in the laboratory for clinical dimensions of alcohol dependence. Following prospective genotyping, 43 alcohol-dependent individuals across the 2 genotype conditions (AA, n = 23 and AG/GG, n = 20) were randomized to 2 intravenous infusion sessions: 1 of alcohol (target breath alcohol concentration = 0.06 g/dl) and 1 of saline. Measures of subjective responses to alcohol were administered in both infusion sessions.

resultsAlcohol-dependent G-allele carriers reported greater alcohol-induced stimulation, vigor, and positive mood, as compared to A-allele homozygotes. There was no genotype effect on alcohol-induced sedation or craving. There was a statistical trend-level severity × alcohol interaction such that individuals at higher levels of severity reported greater alcohol-induced tension reduction.

conclusionsThese results support the hypothesis that OPRM1 genotype moderates the hedonic effects of alcohol, but not the sedative and unpleasant effects of alcohol, in a sample of alcohol-dependent patients. Results are discussed in light of a clinical neuroscience framework to alcoholism.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAffectAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismEthanolFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, Opioid, muYoung AdultEthanolOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID23240711
PMCPMC3548029
OpenAlexW2134187282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.