Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23240062›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Pituitary adenoma volumetry with 3D Slicer.

Jan Egger, Tina Kapur, Christopher Nimsky, Ron Kikinis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Radiomics of pituitary adenoma using computer vision: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan EggerDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. egger@bwh.harvard.edu
Tina Kapur
Christopher Nimsky
Ron Kikinis

Funding

Washington University ConsoritumU54EB005149 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI VAN HORN, JOHN · 2004 to 2013
$39.3M
WHITE MATTER ARCHITECTURE FROM DT-MRIP41RR013218 · NCRR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON · 1998 to 2011
$30.6M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
IMAGE GUIDED THERAPY CENTERP41RR019703 · NCRR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI JOLESZ, FERENC A · 2010 to 2011
$8.6M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR013218NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR019703NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB005149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present pituitary adenoma volumetry using the free and open source medical image computing platform for biomedical research: (3D) Slicer. Volumetric changes in cerebral pathologies like pituitary adenomas are a critical factor in treatment decisions by physicians and in general the volume is acquired manually. Therefore, manual slice-by-slice segmentations in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, which have been obtained at regular intervals, are performed. In contrast to this manual time consuming slice-by-slice segmentation process Slicer is an alternative which can be significantly faster and less user intensive. In this contribution, we compare pure manual segmentations of ten pituitary adenomas with semi-automatic segmentations under Slicer. Thus, physicians drew the boundaries completely manually on a slice-by-slice basis and performed a Slicer-enhanced segmentation using the competitive region-growing based module of Slicer named GrowCut. Results showed that the time and user effort required for GrowCut-based segmentations were on average about thirty percent less than the pure manual segmentations. Furthermore, we calculated the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) between the manual and the Slicer-based segmentations to proof that the two are comparable yielding an average DSC of 81.97±3.39%.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID23240062
PMCPMC3519899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.