Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239805›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Tissue distribution of Neospora caninum in experimentally infected cattle.

Maki Nishimura, Junko Kohara, Jun Hiasa, Yoshikage Muroi, Naoaki Yokoyama, Katsuya Kida, Xuenan Xuan, Hidefumi Furuoka, Yoshifumi Nishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of natural neosporosis on bull sperm quality.Tropical animal health and production · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. A review of neosporosis and pathologic findings of Neospora caninum infection in wildlife.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2015
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maki NishimuraNational Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan.
Junko Kohara
Jun Hiasa
Yoshikage Muroi
Naoaki Yokoyama
Katsuya Kida
Xuenan Xuan
Hidefumi Furuoka
Yoshifumi Nishikawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathology and quantitative PCR (qPCR) were used to determine the tissue distribution of Neospora caninum in calves at 80 days postinfection. Our findings revealed that the most appropriate brain areas for researching N. caninum pathogenesis were the amygdala and hippocampus for qPCR and the corpus striatum and diencephalon for histopathology.

Indexed as

NeosporaAmygdalaAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanCattleCattle DiseasesCoccidiosisCorpus StriatumDiencephalonDNA, ProtozoanHippocampusMaleTissue DistributionAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID23239805
PMCPMC3571275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.