Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239803›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Evaluation of protective potential of Yersinia pestis outer membrane protein antigens as possible candidates for a new-generation recombinant plague vaccine.

Tatiana E Erova, Jason A Rosenzweig, Jian Sha, Giovanni Suarez, Johanna C Sierra, Michelle L Kirtley, Christina J van Lier, Maxim V Telepnev, Vladimir L Motin, Ashok K Chopra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Complete Protection AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomolecules · 2020
    Review
  10. Biomolecules · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Protective Immunity Elicited by Oral Immunization of Mice withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  20. Plague Vaccines: Status and Future.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana E ErovaDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Jason A Rosenzweig
Jian Sha
Giovanni Suarez
Johanna C Sierra
Michelle L Kirtley
Christina J van Lier
Maxim V Telepnev
Vladimir L Motin
Ashok K Chopra
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USTexas Southern University · US

Funding

Task 7 (C29): Development of a Small Animal Model for Dengue N01AI30065 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · 2007 to 2009
$11.1M
Identification of New Antigens for a Plague VaccineR01AI064389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI CHOPRA, ASHOK K · 2005 to 2015
$3.8M
Biodefense Training ProgramT32AI060549 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI ASHOK K CHOPRA, Janice J Endsley · 2004 to 2026
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI060549NIAID NIH HHS AI064389NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030065NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI30065NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064389NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plague caused by Yersinia pestis manifests itself in bubonic, septicemic, and pneumonic forms. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved levofloxacin, there is no approved human vaccine against plague. The capsular antigen F1 and the low-calcium-response V antigen (LcrV) of Y. pestis represent excellent vaccine candidates; however, the inability of the immune responses to F1 and LcrV to provide protection against Y. pestis F1(-) strains or those which harbor variants of LcrV is a significant concern. Here, we show that the passive transfer of hyperimmune sera from rats infected with the plague bacterium and rescued by levofloxacin protected naive animals against pneumonic plague. Furthermore, 10 to 12 protein bands from wild-type (WT) Y. pestis CO92 reacted with the aforementioned hyperimmune sera upon Western blot analysis. Based on mass spectrometric analysis, four of these proteins were identified as attachment invasion locus (Ail/OmpX), plasminogen-activating protease (Pla), outer membrane protein A (OmpA), and F1. The genes encoding these proteins were cloned, and the recombinant proteins purified from Escherichia coli for immunization purposes before challenging mice and rats with either the F1(-) mutant or WT CO92 in bubonic and pneumonic plague models. Although antibodies to Ail and OmpA protected mice against bubonic plague when challenged with the F1(-) CO92 strain, Pla antibodies were protective against pneumonic plague. In the rat model, antibodies to Ail provided protection only against pneumonic plague after WT CO92 challenge. Together, the addition of Y. pestis outer membrane proteins to a new-generation recombinant vaccine could provide protection against a wide variety of Y. pestis strains.

Indexed as

Immunization, PassiveAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsImmune SeraImmunizationLevofloxacinMiceOfloxacinPlaguePlague VaccinePlasminogen ActivatorsRatsRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, SyntheticAil protein, Yersinia pestisAntibodies, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Proteinscaf1 protein, Yersinia pestisImmune SeraLevofloxacinOfloxacinPlague VaccinePla protease, Yersinia pestisPlasminogen ActivatorsRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, SyntheticVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID23239803
PMCPMC3571283
OpenAlexW2149360245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.