Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239799›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Poor immune responses of newborn rhesus macaques to measles virus DNA vaccines expressing the hemagglutinin and fusion glycoproteins.

Fernando P Polack, Shari L Lydy, Sok-Hyong Lee, Paul A Rota, William J Bellini, Robert J Adams, Harriet L Robinson, Diane E Griffin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Viral Disease: Implications for Viral Vaccine Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ontogeny of early life immunity.Trends in immunology · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando P PolackW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Shari L Lydy
Sok-Hyong Lee
Paul A Rota
William J Bellini
Robert J Adams
Harriet L Robinson
Diane E Griffin
Johns Hopkins University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USEmory University · US

Funding

MEASLES VACCINES--IMMUNE RESPONSES AND ATYPICAL MEASLESR01AI035149 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFIN, DIANE E · 1993 to 2001
$719k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI35149PHS HHS PA99066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vaccine that would protect young infants against measles could facilitate elimination efforts and decrease morbidity and mortality in developing countries. However, immaturity of the immune system is an important obstacle to the development of such a vaccine. In this study, DNA vaccines expressing the measles virus (MeV) hemagglutinin (H) protein or H and fusion (F) proteins, previously shown to protect juvenile macaques, were used to immunize groups of 4 newborn rhesus macaques. Monkeys were inoculated intradermally with 200 μg of each DNA at birth and at 10 months of age. As controls, 2 newborn macaques were similarly vaccinated with DNA encoding the influenza virus H5, and 4 received one dose of the current live attenuated MeV vaccine (LAV) intramuscularly. All monkeys were monitored for development of MeV-specific neutralizing and binding IgG antibody and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. These responses were poor compared to the responses induced by LAV. At 18 months of age, all monkeys were challenged intratracheally with a wild-type strain of MeV. Monkeys that received the DNA vaccine encoding H and F, but not H alone, were primed for an MeV-specific CD8(+) CTL response but not for production of antibody. LAV-vaccinated monkeys were protected from rash and viremia, while DNA-vaccinated monkeys developed rashes, similar to control monkeys, but had 10-fold lower levels of viremia. We conclude that vaccination of infant macaques with DNA encoding MeV H and F provided only partial protection from MeV infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHemagglutinins, ViralImmunoglobulin GMacaca mulattaMeaslesMeasles VaccineT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAViral Fusion ProteinsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virushemagglutinin, human influenza A virusHemagglutinins, ViralImmunoglobulin GMeasles VaccineVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAViral Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23239799
PMCPMC3571263
OpenAlexW2105321643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.