Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23239357›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2013

Progress in cell based assays for botulinum neurotoxin detection.

Sabine Pellett

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The mouse diaphragm assay in botulinum toxin therapy.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabine PellettDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. sludwig@wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Characterization of Botulinum Neurotoxin A SubtypesR01AI095274 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, ERIC A. · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Development of a Highly Sensitive Cell-Based Assay for Botulinum NeurotoxinR21AI082826 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, ERIC A. · 2009 to 2010
$408k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI095274-01A1NIAID NIH HHS 1R21AI082826-01A2NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095274NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI082826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are the most potent human toxins known and the causative agent of botulism, and are widely used as valuable pharmaceuticals. The BoNTs are modular proteins consisting of a heavy chain and a light chain linked by a disulfide bond. Intoxication of neuronal cells by BoNTs is a multi-step process including specific cell binding, endocytosis, conformational change in the endosome, translocation of the enzymatic light chain into the cells cytosol, and SNARE target cleavage. The quantitative and reliable potency determination of fully functional BoNTs produced as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) requires an assay that considers all steps in the intoxication pathway. The in vivo mouse bioassay has for years been the 'gold standard' assay used for this purpose, but it requires the use of large numbers of mice and thus causes associated costs and ethical concerns. Cell-based assays are currently the only in vitro alternative that detect fully functional BoNTs in a single assay and have been utilized for years for research purposes. Within the last 5 years, several cell-based BoNT detection assays have been developed that are able to quantitatively determine BoNT potency with similar or greater sensitivity than the mouse bioassay. These assays now offer an alternative method for BoNT potency determination. Such quantitative and reliable BoNT potency determination is a crucial step in basic research, in the development of pharmaceutical BoNTs, and in the quantitative detection of neutralizing antibodies.

Indexed as

Animal Use AlternativesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingBiological AssayBotulinum ToxinsBotulismCell Line, TumorClostridium botulinumEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansImmunoassayMiceNeuronsNeurotoxinsProtein TransportSNARE ProteinsAntibodies, NeutralizingBotulinum ToxinsNeurotoxinsSNARE Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23239357
PMCPMC3644986
OpenAlexW1546903323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.