ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013
Robotic transanal access surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS): current evidence in the treatment of early rectal neoplasia.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Pooled it
- Robot-assisted TAMIS: a systematic review of feasibility and outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Pooled it
- Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer.Ewha medical journal · 2023Review
- Robotic transanal excision of rectal lesions: expert perspective and literature review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Review
- The outcomes of two robotic platforms performing transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasia: a case series of 21 patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Article
- Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with the newest robotic surgical platform: a multi-institutional North American experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): Could this be the solution we have been searching for?Techniques in coloproctology · 2017Article
- Future of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016Review
- SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2015Review
- The Role of Transanal Surgery in the Management of T1 Rectal Cancers.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015Article
- Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution.Techniques in coloproctology · 2015Article
- Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Article
- Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery in benign rectal tumour.Journal of robotic surgery · 2014Article
- Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.Journal of robotic surgery · 2014Article
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Article
- Robotic-assisted transanal surgery for total mesorectal excision (RATS-TME): a description of a novel surgical approach with video demonstration.Techniques in coloproctology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transanal use of laparoscopic instrumentation has been described in several case reports as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Both of these techniques have significant technical limitations due to anatomical constrictions. Robotic technology with articulating instruments has been effectively used in many areas with anatomic limitations similar to the intraluminal use within the rectum. We present the technique of a full-thickness transanal resection of a rectal polyp with endorectal suturing using a robotic platform. Larger case series and trials are needed to compare outcome and cost with TEM. Alternative robotic platforms and instrumentation may be further developed for different and more advanced indications of transanal access surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23239290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.